Effects of various chair-side surface treatment methods on dental restorative materials with respect to contact angles and surface roughness.

Dent Mater J

Interdisciplinary Department of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Department of Craniomaxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, University Cologne.

Published: May 2017

Available chair-side surface treatment methods may adversely affect prosthetic materials and promote plaque accumulation. This study investigated the effects of treatment procedures on three resin restorative materials, zirconium-dioxide and polyetheretherketone in terms of surface roughness and hydrophobicity. Treatments were grinding with silicon carbide paper or white Arkansas stone, blasting with prophylaxis powder and polishing with diamond paste. Surface roughness was assessed using confocal laser scanning. Hydrophobicity as measured by water contact angle was determined by computerized image analysis using the sessile drop technique. All of the specific surface treatments performed led to significant changes in contact angle values and surface roughness (Ra) values. Median contact angle values ranged from 51.6° to 114°. Ra values ranged from 0.008 µm to 2.917 µm. Air-polishing as well as other polishing procedures increased surface roughness values in all materials except zirconium dioxide. Polyetheretherketone displayed greatest change in contact angle values after air-polishing treatment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-098DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

surface roughness
20
contact angle
16
angle values
12
surface
8
chair-side surface
8
surface treatment
8
treatment methods
8
restorative materials
8
roughness values
8
values ranged
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!