Background: In December 2014, China announced that only voluntarily donated organs from citizens would be used for transplantation after January 1, 2015. Many medical professionals worldwide believe that China has stopped using organs from death-row prisoners.

Discussion: In the present article, we briefly review the historical development of organ procurement from death-row prisoners in China and comprehensively analyze the social-political background and the legal basis of the announcement. The announcement was not accompanied by any change in organ sourcing legislations or regulations. As a fact, the use of prisoner organs remains legal in China. Even after January 2015, key Chinese transplant officials have repeatedly stated that death-row prisoners have the same right as regular citizens to "voluntarily donate" organs. This perpetuates an unethical organ procurement system in ongoing violation of international standards.

Conclusions: Organ sourcing from death-row prisoners has not stopped in China. The 2014 announcement refers to the intention to stop the use of organs illegally harvested without the consent of the prisoners. Prisoner organs procured with "consent" are now simply labelled as "voluntarily donations from citizens". The semantic switch may whitewash sourcing from both death-row prisoners and prisoners of conscience. China can gain credibility only by enacting new legislation prohibiting use of prisoner organs and by making its organ sourcing system open to international inspections. Until international ethical standards are transparently met, sanctions should remain.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4668660PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0074-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

death-row prisoners
20
organ procurement
12
organ sourcing
12
prisoner organs
12
historical development
8
procurement death-row
8
prisoners china
8
january 2015
8
sourcing death-row
8
prisoners
7

Similar Publications

Nuanced portrayals of stigmatized groups in media have been shown to reduce prejudice. In an online experiment (N = 749), we tested whether a feature film depicting incarcerated peoples' experiences in the criminal justice system can increase a) empathic accuracy and compassion toward people who have been incarcerated and b) support for criminal justice reform. We measured baseline empathic accuracy via a well-validated task, where participants infer the emotions of people sharing stories about difficult life events.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Use of Electroconvulsive Therapy on Death Row.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law

September 2023

Dr. Shah is a Forensic Psychiatry Fellow; Dr. Morris is an Assistant Professor of Clinical Psychiatry; Dr. McNiel is a Professor of Clinical Psychology; and Dr. Binder is a Professor of Psychiatry and Director, Psychiatry and the Law Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

Despite high rates of mental illness among incarcerated people in the United States, use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) remains limited in jails and prisons. There are some published guidelines regarding the provision of mental health care, including ECT, in U.S.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Suffering through substance withdrawal is a major problem for the majority of individuals in custody, yet there are no guidelines or standards to ensure their safety. Instead, individuals in custody are having their Constitutional rights violated and many die at the hands of the justice system. When their families seek accountability for the lack of adequate care provided by correctional facilities and employees, families are faced with a lack of consistency from one circuit to the next for knowing as to the correct standard to have a successful claim.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Death-row organ donation, revisited.

Bioethics

July 2023

Department of Philosophy, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.

In 2011, bioethicists turned their attention to the question of whether prisoners on death row ought to be allowed to be organ donors. The discussion began with a provocative anti-procurement article by Arthur Caplan and prompted responses from an impressive lineup of commentators. In the 10 years since, the situation for death-row inmates seeking to donate has hardly changed: U.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Mental Health and Legal Implications of Access to the Outdoors during Incarceration.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law

March 2023

Dr. Morris and Dr. Izenberg are Assistant Professors at the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

The prevalence of mental disorders and substance use disorders among incarcerated populations has called attention to the availability of mental health services in U.S. jails and prisons.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!