Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The performance of the three-layer ONIOM method was systematically investigated by comparing the optimized geometries and calculated deprotonation energy of a zwitterionic peptide molecule, NH3(+)-CH(n)Bu-CO-NH-CH2-CO-NH-CH(n)Bu-COO(-), using all possible combinations of B3LYP/6-31G* as the high-level quantum (HQ), AM1 as the low-level quantum (LQ), and Amber as the MM method. Results show that the three-layer ONIOM(HQ:LQ:MM) method, which includes a medium-level quantum method in the middle system to take into account the electronic effects of the middle layer and to keep the problematic QM-MM boundary away from the action region, is more reliable and more stable than the QM:MM:MM or generic QM/MM method and is the best compromise between accuracy and computational cost.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct600135b | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!