Assessment of Impact of Long-Cassette Standing X-Rays on Surgical Planning for Cervical Pathology: An International Survey of Spine Surgeons.

Neurosurgery

*Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia;‡Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Sacramento, California;§Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York;¶Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, Colorado;‖Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island;#Department of Neurosurgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois;**Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas;‡‡Department of Neurosurgery, Atlanta Brain and Spine Care, Atlanta, Georgia;§§Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, Washington;¶¶Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;‖‖Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Published: May 2016

Background: Understanding the role of regional segments of the spine in maintaining global balance has garnered significant attention recently. Long-cassette radiographs (LCR) are necessary to evaluate global spinopelvic alignment. However, it is unclear how LCRs impact operative decision-making for cervical spine pathology.

Objective: To evaluate whether the addition of LCRs results in changes to respondents' operative plans compared to standard imaging of the involved cervical spine in an international survey of spine surgeons.

Methods: Fifteen cases (5 control cases with normal and 10 test cases with abnormal global alignment) of cervical pathology were presented online with a vignette and cervical imaging. Surgeons were asked to select a surgical plan from 6 options, ranging from the least (1 point) to most (6 points) extensive. Cases were then reordered and presented again with LCRs and the same surgical plan question.

Results: One hundred fifty-seven surgeons completed the survey, of which 79% were spine fellowship trained. The mean response scores for surgical plan increased from 3.28 to 4.0 (P = .003) for test cases with the addition of LCRs. However, no significant changes (P = .10) were identified for the control cases. In 4 of the test cases with significant mid thoracic kyphosis, 29% of participants opted for the more extensive surgical options of extension to the mid and lower thoracic spine when they were provided with cervical imaging only, which significantly increased to 58.3% upon addition of LCRs.

Conclusion: In planning for cervical spine surgery, surgeons should maintain a low threshold for obtaining LCRs to assess global spinopelvic alignment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000001128DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cervical spine
12
test cases
12
surgical plan
12
planning cervical
8
cervical pathology
8
international survey
8
spine
8
survey spine
8
global spinopelvic
8
spinopelvic alignment
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!