AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to investigate how diabetes and metformin treatment affect overall and progression-free survival in endometrial cancer patients, factoring out confounding variables through propensity score matching.
  • A total of 1303 patients were reviewed, with 277 having diabetes; treatment varied among diabetic patients, with 41.9% using metformin.
  • Results showed no significant differences in overall and progression-free survival between diabetic and nondiabetic patients or among metformin users compared to others, indicating that diabetes status and metformin do not significantly influence outcomes in endometrial cancer.

Article Abstract

Objective: To examine the influence of diabetes and metformin therapy on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) by using propensity score (PS) matching to account for confounding factors.

Methods: We retrospectively identified consecutive patients with stage I-IV EC managed surgically from 1999 through 2008 and stratified patients by diabetes status. PS matching was used to adjust for confounding covariates. OS and PFS were compared between diabetic and nondiabetic matched pairs and between matched pairs of diabetic patients with or without metformin therapy. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to estimate the effects on outcomes.

Results: Among 1303 eligible patients (79% stage I, 28% grade 3), 277 (21.3%) had a history of diabetes. Among diabetic patients, treatment consisted of metformin in 116 (41.9%); 57 (20.6%) had other oral agents, 51 (18.4%) insulin with or without other oral agents, and 53 (19.1%) diet modification only. For PS-matched diabetic and nondiabetic patients with EC, OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.72-1.42) and PFS (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.60-1.69) were similar between matched subsets. No differences in OS and PFS were observed when comparing PS-matched metformin users with nondiabetic patients (OS HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.57-1.85; PFS HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.49-2.62) or with other diabetic patients (OS HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.30-1.23; PFS HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.34-3.30).

Conclusions: When adjusted for confounding covariates, OS and PFS are similar between diabetic and nondiabetic patients with EC and between metformin users and nonusers or nondiabetic patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.11.019DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nondiabetic patients
16
diabetic nondiabetic
12
diabetic patients
12
patients
11
diabetes metformin
8
endometrial cancer
8
metformin therapy
8
confounding covariates
8
covariates pfs
8
matched pairs
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!