Impact of Sample Matrix on Accuracy of Peptide Quantification: Assessment of Calibrator and Internal Standard Selection and Method Validation.

Anal Chem

Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Health Science Building, Room H-272M, Box 357610, Seattle, Washington 98195-7610, United States.

Published: January 2016

AI Article Synopsis

  • - Protein quantification using LC-MS/MS is a developing technique for measuring various proteins, but guidelines for selecting and validating quantification peptides are lacking, and the effects of biological matrices on this process need further study.
  • - This research focuses on how different biological samples influence the digestion, stability, and detection of specific peptides from proteins involved in retinoic acid synthesis, revealing significant differences in digestion efficiency and sensitivity.
  • - The study highlights that choosing proper calibration and internal standards can greatly impact the precision and accuracy of protein quantification, ultimately leading to the validation of a method using stable isotope labeled peptides for human liver samples.

Article Abstract

Protein quantification based on peptides using LC-MS/MS has emerged as a promising method to measure biomarkers, protein drugs, and endogenous proteins. However, the best practices for selection, optimization, and validation of the quantification peptides are not well established, and the influence of different matrices on protein digestion, peptide stability, and MS detection has not been systematically addressed. The aim of this study was to determine how biological matrices affect digestion, detection, and stability of peptides. The microsomal retinol dehydrogenase (RDH11) and cytosolic soluble aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDH1As) involved in the synthesis of retinoic acid (RA) were chosen as model proteins. Considerable differences in the digestion efficiency, sensitivity, and matrix effects between peptides were observed regardless of the target protein's subcellular localization. The precision and accuracy of the quantification of RDH11 and ALDH1A were affected by the choice of calibration and internal standards. The final method using recombinant protein calibrators and stable isotope labeled (SIL) peptide internal standards was validated for human liver. The results demonstrate that different sample matrices have peptide, time, and matrix specific effects on protein digestion and absolute quantification.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4817721PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

protein digestion
8
internal standards
8
quantification
5
protein
5
impact sample
4
sample matrix
4
matrix accuracy
4
peptide
4
accuracy peptide
4
peptide quantification
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!