Response to Standardized MR Terminology and Reporting of Implants and Devices as Recommended by the American College of Radiology Subcommittee on MR Safety.

Radiology

From the Offices of Science and Engineering Laboratories (T.O.W.), In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health (J.G.D.), and Device Evaluation (M.J.S.), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993.

Published: June 2016

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) continually works toward the goal of safety. For patients with magnetic resonance (MR) Conditional devices, safety is achieved when MR Conditional labeling is clear and accessible and can be unambiguously interpreted and applied. The FDA supports the three facets of standardization listed by the American College of Radiology (ACR) Subcommittee on MR Safety in their special report: (a) standardization in terminology and reporting of spatial gradient magnetic fields associated with MR systems; (b) standardization in reporting of ferromagnetic testing results for implants and devices; and (c) standardization, consistency, and clarity in radiofrequency power deposition guidelines and terminology. While the FDA is in agreement with the ACR Subcommittee on MR Safety that patient safety is of primary concern, the authors disagree with the Subcommittee on several important points and offer a point-by-point response to the Subcommittee's four recommendations. (©) RSNA, 2015.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015151108DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

subcommittee safety
12
terminology reporting
8
implants devices
8
american college
8
college radiology
8
acr subcommittee
8
safety
6
response standardized
4
standardized terminology
4
reporting implants
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!