Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: Use of indication-specific CT protocols and adjustment of scan parameters to decrease radiation exposure may result in significant dose reduction. We implemented these strategies and compare pre- and post-implementation radiation dose in emergency department (ED) patients.
Method: This was a descriptive, retrospective study. Patients older than 15 years who had undergone emergency CT examinations of the head, chest, abdomen, pelvis and abdominopelvic region in periods before and after dose-reduction implementation were included. The primary outcome was volume CT dose index (CTDIvol ) and dose length products (DLP).
Results: There were 786 studies in the pre-implementation (group 1) and 955 studies in the post-implementation (group 2) periods. Radiation dose from all CT types significantly reduced in the post-implementation period. Average CTDIvol for head, chest, abdomen, pelvis and abdominopelvic region (doses during pre-implementation period in parentheses) were 51.5 (109), 8.1 (30.4), 13.1 (41.8), 11 (38), 11.2 (41.8) mGy, respectively. Average DLP was also significantly lower (pre-implementation dose in parentheses) in all CT types, which were 943 (2232), 324 (2517), 944 (5605), 280 (4024), 809 (7118) mGy●cm, respectively. Patients' age, gender, body mass index and size were not significantly different between the two groups. Image quality decreased but almost all examinations received an acceptable diagnostic subjective image quality.
Conclusion: Simple methods could help significantly reduce CT radiation exposure in ED patients while maintaining an acceptable level of diagnostic image quality.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12410 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!