AI Article Synopsis

  • The study explores intramuscular pressure (IMP) as a potential clinical measure for muscle tension, specifically in the tibialis anterior during passive tension.
  • A novel method using cine phase contrast MRI was developed to quantify 3D volumetric strain distribution in the muscle while assessing measurement accuracy and precision through various tests.
  • Results showed minimal error in leg position drift and surface node trajectory, indicating high accuracy and consistency in volumetric strain measurements across multiple data collections.

Article Abstract

Intramuscular pressure (IMP), a correlate of muscle tension, may fill an important clinical testing void. A barrier to implementing this measure clinically is its non-uniform distribution, which is not fully understood. Pressure is generated by changes in fluid mass and volume, therefore 3D volumetric strain distribution may affect IMP distribution. The purpose of this study was to develop a method for quantifying 3D volumetric strain distribution in the human tibialis anterior (TA) during passive tension using cine phase contrast (CPC) MRI and to assess its accuracy and precision.Five healthy subjects each participated in three data collections. A custom MRI-compatible apparatus repeatedly rotated a subject's ankle between 0° and 26° plantarflexion while CPC MRI data were collected. Additionally, T2-weighted images of the lower leg were collected both before and after the CPC data collection with the ankle stationary at both 0° and 26° plantarflexion for TA muscle segmentation. A 3D hexahedral mesh was generated based on the TA surface before CPC data collection with the ankle at 0° plantarflexion and the node trajectories were tracked using the CPC data. The volumetric strain of each element was quantified.Three tests were employed to assess the measure accuracy and precision. First, to quantify leg position drift, the TA segmentations were compared before and after CPC data collection. The Hawsdorff distance measure (error) was 1.5  ±  0.7 mm. Second, to assess the surface node trajectory accuracy, the deformed mesh surface was compared to the TA segmented at 26° of ankle plantarflexion. This error was 0.6  ±  0.2 mm. Third, the standard deviation of volumetric strain across the three data collections was calculated for each element and subject. The median between-day variability across subjects and mesh elements was 0.06 mm3 mm(-3) (95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.18 mm3 mm(-3)). Overall the results demonstrated excellent accuracy and precision.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4838532PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/36/12/N135DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

volumetric strain
16
cpc data
16
strain distribution
12
data collection
12
method quantifying
8
cine phase
8
phase contrast
8
cpc mri
8
three data
8
data collections
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!