A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Reverse Distraction Cranioplasty for Treatment of Hydrocephalic Megalocephaly. | LitMetric

Reverse Distraction Cranioplasty for Treatment of Hydrocephalic Megalocephaly.

J Craniofac Surg

*Division of Plastic Surgery, University of California, San Diego †Rady Children's Hospital San Diego ‡Division of Neurosurgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.

Published: November 2015

Macrocephaly resulting from untreated hydrocephalus is a rare but difficult condition to treat. The patient presented is a 6-year-old boy who had progressively increasing head size since birth secondary to untreated hydrocephalus with associated developmental delay. His initial head circumference was 69 cm, and computed tomography scan showed evidence of obstructive hydrocephalus. For the first stage of the procedure, bicoronal and circumferential strip craniectomies were performed, 5 fully open 3.5 mm midface distractors were placed to facilitate vault reduction, and absorbable plates were placed in the frontoorbital region. Neurosurgery also performed an endoscopic third ventriculostomy and placed an external ventricular drain. Reverse distraction was completed over 5 days and tolerated well by the patient. Three months after the first procedure, the distractors were removed and frontoorbital reduction and additional cranial vault reduction and reshaping were performed. At 1 month following this operation he was noted to have excellent forehead contour and dramatic improvement of his macrocephaly with some remaining mid-vault asymmetry. His head circumference was measured at 61.5 cm with bicoronal distance of 39.5 cm. He demonstrated improvement in head control and ability to sit. This patient demonstrates a new technique for reduction cranioplasty involving the use of reverse distraction to facilitate gradual and controlled reduction prior to extensive cranial vault remodeling. The challenges associated with managing hydrocephalus in cranial vault reduction patients are also addressed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002254DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reverse distraction
12
vault reduction
12
cranial vault
12
untreated hydrocephalus
8
head circumference
8
reduction
6
distraction cranioplasty
4
cranioplasty treatment
4
treatment hydrocephalic
4
hydrocephalic megalocephaly
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!