Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Kidney transplantation is now accepted to be the best treatment for end-stage renal disease. Despite the improvement of immunosuppressive therapy, there is still actually substantial loss of allografts, in part due to uncontrolled humoral immunity. For many years, the primary technique for the detection of anti-HLA antibodies was the CDC (complement dependent cytotoxicity). The recent use of solid phase assays, mainly the Luminex technology allowed detection of antibodies at much lower levels, and it has been shown that these antibodies have negative impact on the graft survival. We herein review the principal techniques for anti-HLA detection and the different presentations of humoral rejection.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.12816/0015839 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!