Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Treatment of myelomeningocele and arthrogrypotic foot deformities has been controversial; many different procedures have been advocated for each type of deformity. In most cases, outcomes have had variable success rates, and many complications can occur. Treatment strategies should highlight care that avoids the development of a stiffened foot and allows for a variety of options to regain correction when a relapse occurs. This is particularly true in myelomeningocele, whereby a stiff foot runs a high risk for skin ulceration, leading to osteomyelitis. Discussion includes appropriate circumstances for the use of presented procedures and the author's preferred treatment for each deformity.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2015.07.010 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!