Review of clinically accessible methods to determine lean body mass for normalization of standardized uptake values.

Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging

Department of Public Health and Primary Care KU Leuven campus Kortrijk, Kortrijk, Belgium -

Published: March 2016

With the routine use of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]-fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans, metabolic activity of tumors can be quantitatively assessed through calculation of SUVs. One possible normalization parameter for the standardized uptake value (SUV) is lean body mass (LBM), which is generally calculated through predictive equations based on height and body weight. (Semi-)direct measurements of LBM could provide more accurate results in cancer populations than predictive equations based on healthy populations. In this context, four methods to determine LBM are reviewed: bioelectrical impedance analysis, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. CT, and magnetic resonance imaging. These methods were selected based on clinical accessibility and are compared in terms of methodology, precision and accuracy. By assessing each method's specific advantages and limitations, a well-considered choice of method can hopefully lead to more accurate SUVLBM values, hence more accurate quantitative assessment of 18F-FDG PET images.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

methods determine
8
lean body
8
body mass
8
standardized uptake
8
predictive equations
8
equations based
8
review clinically
4
clinically accessible
4
accessible methods
4
determine lean
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!