Ectoparasite Infestations and Canine Infection by Rickettsiae and Ehrlichiae in a Semi-Arid Region of Northeastern Brazil.

Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis

1 Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias, Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco , Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil .

Published: November 2015

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examined the prevalence of Rickettsia spp. and Ehrlichia canis in dogs and their ectoparasites in Petrolina and Juazeiro, Brazil, using immunofluorescence assays and PCR testing.
  • A total of 12.1% of canine plasma samples tested positive for Rickettsia spp. antibodies, while 23.0% reactive to E. canis, with E. canis DNA found in 8.3% of blood samples.
  • Findings suggest that E. canis infection may be endemic in the Caatinga biome; however, lower rates of Rickettsia spp. compared to other Brazilian regions could be linked to less exposure to specific tick species in the sem

Article Abstract

This study investigated the prevalence of Rickettsia spp. and Ehrlichia canis infection in dogs and their ectoparasites from rural and urban areas of two municipalities, Petrolina and Juazeiro, within a semiarid region (Caatinga biome) of northeastern Brazil, by immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Overall, 12.1% (61/504) and 23.0% (116/504) of canine plasma samples had antibodies reactive to Rickettsia spp. and E. canis. E. canis DNA was detected by PCR in 8.3% (42/504) of canine blood samples, whereas no blood sample was positive for Rickettsia spp. The infection by E. canis was determined by PCR in 4.9% (14/285) Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato (s.l.) ticks and by Rickettsia felis in 1.1% (3/285) and 40.6% (74/182) ticks and fleas, respectively. Multivariate regression analyses revealed that canine seropositivity to Rickettsia spp. was associated statistically with the variables "to reside in Petrolina" and "presence of ectoparasites." Our results indicate that canine infection by E. canis might be endemic in the Caatinga biome as it is in other Brazilian biomes. Although no previous serosurvey for Rickettsia spp. has been conducted on dogs from the Caatinga biome, our values are much lower than the ones reported for rural dogs from other Brazilian biomes. These differences are likely related to the semiarid climate of the aatinga biome, which minimizes the exposure of rural dogs to Amblyomma spp. ticks, the most common vectors of Rickettsia spp. in Brazil. Considering that dogs are excellent sentinels for human exposure to Rickettsia spp., we can infer that the risks of human acquiring tick-borne rickettsiosis in the Caatinga region of the present study are low. The rickettsial infection rates in fleas and ticks were not related to canine seropositivity; i.e., areas with higher Rickettsia infection rates in fleas had the lowest canine seroreactivity to Rickettsia spp.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652196PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2015.1786DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rickettsia spp
32
caatinga biome
12
rickettsia
10
spp
9
canine infection
8
northeastern brazil
8
infection canis
8
canine seropositivity
8
brazilian biomes
8
rural dogs
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!