A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Biomechanical evaluation of periprosthetic refractures following distal femur locking plate fixation. | LitMetric

Biomechanical evaluation of periprosthetic refractures following distal femur locking plate fixation.

Injury

The University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Route 0165, Galveston, TX 77555, United States. Electronic address:

Published: December 2015

Introduction: Distal femur fractures proximal to total knee femoral component constitutes the most prevalent type of periprosthetic fracture, and plate fixation treatment is associated with a 7.7% incidence of refracture proximal to the plate. The primary objective of this study was to compare proximal fixation techniques of a periprosthetic distal femur fracture plate in an osteoporotic bone model. The secondary objective was to determine the subsequent periprosthetic plate fracture pattern and/or complexity associated with each proximal plate fixation configuration.

Materials And Methods: A segmental defect was created in 21 synthetic osteoporotic adult femurs 6 cm proximal to the distal femur and all specimens were stabilised with a 246 mm locking femur plate. Fixation in the most proximal hole was varied by use of either a cerclage cable, unicortical locking screw, or a bicortical locking screw. Specimens were tested to failure in simultaneous eccentric compression and torsion.

Results: Proximal cerclage fixation demonstrated higher mean maximum axial force at failure (4142.67±178.71 N, p<0.001), stiffness (443.8±61.64 N/mm), and maximum torque (20.9±0.93 N m, p<0.001). Unicortical and bicortical screw refractures occurred at the screw, cerclage wire refractures occurred at the first proximal screw distal to the cerclage.

Conclusions: In periprosthetic distal femur fracture locking plate fixation, proximal hole stabilization with a cerclage wire tolerates significantly higher failure forces while distributing forces distal to the area within the plate fixation. Cerclage wiring may be an option in distal femur periprosthetic fractures to alleviate stress risers in vulnerable bone.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.09.033DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

distal femur
16
plate fixation
16
fracture plate
8
proximal plate
8
locking screw
8
plate
7
proximal
7
fixation
6
femur
5
biomechanical evaluation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!