Combined Microsatellite Instability, MLH1 Methylation Analysis, and Immunohistochemistry for Lynch Syndrome Screening in Endometrial Cancers From GOG210: An NRG Oncology and Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

J Clin Oncol

Paul J. Goodfellow, Caroline C. Billingsley, David E. Cohn, Heather Hampel, Alexis S. Chassen, Luke V. Simmons, and Floor Backes, Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Lankes and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; Russell J. Broaddus, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Colin C. Pritchard, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Amy P. Schmidt, Feng Gao, Matthew A. Powell, and David Mutch, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Louise A. Brinton, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC; Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; and Richard J. Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA.

Published: December 2015

Purpose: The best screening practice for Lynch syndrome (LS) in endometrial cancer (EC) remains unknown. We sought to determine whether tumor microsatellite instability (MSI) typing along with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and MLH1 methylation analysis can help identify women with LS.

Patients And Methods: ECs from GOG210 patients were assessed for MSI, MLH1 methylation, and mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression. Each tumor was classified as having normal MMR, defective MMR associated with MLH1 methylation, or probable MMR mutation (ie, defective MMR but no methylation). Cancer family history and demographic and clinical features were compared for the three groups. Lynch mutation testing was performed for a subset of women.

Results: Analysis of 1,002 ECs suggested possible MMR mutation in 11.8% of tumors. The number of patients with a family history suggestive of LS was highest among women whose tumors were classified as probable MMR mutation (P = .001). Lynch mutations were identified in 41% of patient cases classified as probable mutation (21 of 51 tested). One of the MSH6 Lynch mutations was identified in a patient whose tumor had intact MSH6 expression. Age at diagnosis was younger for mutation carriers than noncarriers (54.3 v 62.3 years; P < .01), with five carriers diagnosed at age > 60 years.

Conclusion: Combined MSI, methylation, and IHC analysis may prove useful in Lynch screening in EC. Twenty-four percent of mutation carriers presented with ECs at age > 60 years, and one carrier had an MSI-positive tumor with no IHC defect. Restricting Lynch testing to women diagnosed at age < 60 years or to women with IHC defects could result in missing a substantial fraction of genetic disease.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4678181PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.63.9518DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mlh1 methylation
16
mmr mutation
12
microsatellite instability
8
methylation analysis
8
lynch syndrome
8
defective mmr
8
probable mmr
8
family history
8
classified probable
8
lynch mutations
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!