Objective: To evaluate the efficiency of 3 different obturation techniques; motor driven lentulospiral, hand held lentulospiral and reamer in primary anterior teeth and presence of voids by analyzing with CBCT.

Study Design: 60 single rooted extracted primary teeth were prepared and obturated with ZOE paste. Obturation methods were divided into three groups. GROUP I- motor driven lentulo spiral, II- hand held lentulo spiral and III- reamer. Obturated samples were scanned in CBCT machine and images were analysed for the evaluation of their quality of fill comprising presence, location and size of voids.

Results: At all the locations, Group II had maximum number of sites with voids when compared to other two groups. However, statistically significant intergroup differences were observed only at coronal third location (p=0.001) and overall assessment (p=0.003). Number of affected sites revealed the difference between Groups I and II be significant statistically (p=0.002) while the difference between Groups I and III and between Groups II and III was not significant statistically (p>0.05). At all the locations as well as for combined assessment, Group I had minimum mean size of the void.

Conclusion: Motor driven lentulo spiral technique demonstrated more number of optimal fills with fewer voids when compared to hand held lentulo spiral technique and reamer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-39.5.462DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lentulo spiral
16
motor driven
12
hand held
12
obturation methods
8
primary teeth
8
driven lentulo
8
held lentulo
8
number sites
8
voids compared
8
groups statistically
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!