Everolimus-eluting stent versus Sirolimus-eluting stent for prognostic significance.

Int J Cardiol

AOU Maggiore della Carità, Eastern Piedmont University, C.so Mazzini 18, 28100 Novara, Italy; Division of Cardiology, S.G. Moscati, Avellino, Italy.

Published: January 2016

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.08.194DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

everolimus-eluting stent
4
stent versus
4
versus sirolimus-eluting
4
sirolimus-eluting stent
4
stent prognostic
4
prognostic significance
4
everolimus-eluting
1
versus
1
sirolimus-eluting
1
stent
1

Similar Publications

Introduction And Objectives: Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in vessels with moderate-to-severe tortuosity are at higher risk of adverse outcomes, but data are scarce in the era of newer-generation stents. We compared outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in vessels with moderate-to-severe tortuosity using a bioresorbable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) vs a durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent.

Methods: A total of 2350 patients from the BIOFLOW II, IV, and V randomized trials were stratified into 2 groups based on target-vessel tortuosity: none-to-mild and moderate-to-severe.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study investigates the effectiveness of bioresorbable scaffolds (IBS) versus everolimus-eluting stents (EES) for treating below-the-knee arterial disease in dogs, focusing on their support performance and effects on tissue.
  • Both types of implants were successfully used, showing similar levels of arterial narrowing within the first six months, but the IBS scaffold exhibited gradual corrosion over time.
  • Overall, the findings indicate that the IBS is comparable to EES in terms of support and tissue response within 6 months, while demonstrating a manageable corrosion profile over a year.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Long-term clinical data on biodegradable-polymer (BP) drug-eluting stents (DES) are limited. The objective of this study was to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of the BP-DES SYNERGY compared to XIENCE V, a durable-polymer (DP)-DES.

Methods: We compared patients treated with BP-DES or DP-DES at our center from 2008 to 2020.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Adult Kawasaki patients may require intervention for occlusive coronary artery disease. Some adverse effects of first-generation drug-eluting stent implantation with sirolimus have been reported in this population.

Methods: A total of nine lesions in eight (seven males, one female) patients who underwent stent implantations in this population between 2000 and 2021 were reviewed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A multicenter study is assessing the safety and effectiveness of a cutting balloon angioplasty combined with a bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent for treating calcified coronary artery lesions in patients.
  • The trial involves comparing the cutting balloon (Wolverine™) to a non-compliant balloon in a group of 250 patients who have received the Synergy™ stent, focusing on outcomes like stent area, major cardiac events, and operational metrics.
  • The research aims to validate the use of cutting balloons for a range of calcified lesions, potentially influencing insurance coverage for these procedures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!