Choroidal Line Scan Measurements in Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography as Surrogates for Volumetric Thickness Assessment.

Purpose: To compare choroidal thickness of different areas on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SSOCT) line and cube scans for their interchangeable use.

Design: Validity analysis.

Methods: SSOCT line and cube scans were obtained from 21 patients with various choroidal thicknesses. Subfoveal center point choroidal thickness, mean central millimeter choroidal thickness, and mean 6-mm-area choroidal thicknesses were obtained from both eyes by 2 independent graders in a reading center setting. Cross-correlations were performed using Passing and Bablok regression models. A 95% confidence interval of slope that included 1 was considered to indicate no significant difference. Average choroidal thickness of center point, Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study grid subfields, and total grid area of 6 mm on both scans and the correlation between different areas served as main outcome measures.

Results: No significant difference between line scans/corresponding subfields of cube scans (outer nasal 0.92-1.11, inner nasal 0.88-1.06, central 0.94-1.11, inner temporal 0.95-1.12, outer temporal 0.93-1.17). No significant difference between subfoveal center point measurement/mean of choroidal thickness in the central millimeter of cube scans (0.89-1.08). Significant difference of subfoveal center point measurement or mean of central millimeter area of cube scans to entire 6-mm area of cube scans (1.01-1.53 and 1.03-1.38).

Conclusions: Measurements on a single SSOCT horizontal line scan can represent the entire choroid but subfoveal center point measurements are only indicative for the central millimeter area. There is a consistent overestimation of choroidal thickness when trying to estimate overall choroidal thickness from any central measurement.