Standardizing communication from acute care providers to primary care providers on critically ill adults.

Am J Crit Care

Kerri A. Ellis is an assistant clinical professor in the Graduate School of Nursing and an acute care nurse practitioner in the Department of Medicine at UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts. Ann Connolly is a nurse practitioner in the Department of Medicine at UMass Memorial Medical Center. Alireza Hosseinnezhad is a physician in the Department of Medicine, Saint Vincent Hospital, Worcester, Massachusetts. Craig M. Lilly is a professor in the Departments of Medicine, Anesthesiology, and Surgery, and in the Clinical and Population Health Research Program at the Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.

Published: November 2015

Objective: To increase the frequency of communication of patient information between acute and primary care providers. A secondary objective was to determine whether higher rates of communication were associated with lower rates of hospital readmission 30 days after discharge.

Methods: A validated instrument was used for telephone surveys before and after an intervention designed to increase the frequency of communication among acute care and primary care providers. The communication intervention was implemented in 3 adult intensive care units from 2 campuses of an academic medical center.

Results: The frequency of communication among acute care and primary care providers, the perceived usefulness of the intervention, and its association with 30-day readmission rates were assessed for 202 adult intensive care episodes before and 100 episodes after a communication intervention. The frequency of documented communication increased significantly (5/202 or 2% before to 72/100 or 72% after the intervention; P < .001) and the communication was considered useful by every participating primary care provider. Rates of rehospitalization at 30 days were lower for the intervention group than the preintervention group, but the difference was not statistically significant (41/202 or 23% vs 16/88 or 18% of discharged patients; P = .45; power 0.112 at P = .05).

Conclusions: The frequency of communication episodes that provide value can be increased through standardized processes. The key aspects of this effective intervention were setting the expectation that communication should occur, documenting when communication has occurred, and reviewing that documentation during multiprofessional rounds.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2015332DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

care providers
20
primary care
20
frequency communication
16
communication acute
12
acute care
12
communication
11
care
10
increase frequency
8
care primary
8
communication intervention
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!