AI Article Synopsis

  • The study quantified how fracture geometry and the rigidity of restorative materials affect stress distribution in restored fractured central maxillary incisors, focusing on adhesive interfaces.
  • Three fracture plane orientations were modeled using finite element analysis to assess how different angles influence stress intensity and distribution under controlled loading conditions.
  • Results showed significant variations in stress levels, with the -30° fracture model experiencing the highest interfacial stress, while the rigidity of restorative materials provided minimal impact on the stress state in certain models.

Article Abstract

Objective: To quantify the influence of fracture geometry and restorative materials rigidity on the stress intensity and distribution of restored fractured central maxillary incisors (CMI) with particular investigation of the adhesive interfaces. Ancillary objectives are to present an innovative technology to measure the in vivo strain state of sound maxillary incisors and to present the collected data.

Methods: A validation experimental biomechanics approach has been associated to finite element analysis. FEA models consisted of CMI, periodontal ligament and the corresponding alveolar bone process. Three models were created representing different orientation of the fracture planes. Three different angulations of the fracture plane in buccal-palatal direction were modeled: the fracture plane perpendicular to the long axis in the buccal-palatal direction (0°); the fracture plane inclined bucco-palatally in apical-coronal direction (-30°); the fracture plane inclined palatal-buccally in apical-coronal direction (+30°). First set of computing runs was performed for in vivo FE-model validation purposes. In the second part, a 50N force was applied on the buccal aspect of the CMI models. Ten patients were selected and subjected to the strain measurement of CMI under controlled loading conditions.

Results: The main differences were noticed in the middle and incisal thirds of incisors crowns, due to the presence of the incisal portion restoration. The stress intensity in -30° models is increased in the enamel structure close to the restoration, due to a thinning of the remaining natural tissues. The rigidity of the restoring material slightly reduces such phenomenon. -30° model exhibits the higher interfacial stress in the adhesive layer with respect to +30° and 0° models. The lower stress intensity was noticed in the 0° models, restoration material rigidity did not influenced the interfacial stress state in 0° models. On the contrary, material rigidity influenced the interfacial stress state in +30° and -30° models, higher rigidity restoring materials exhibits lower interfacial stress with respect to low rigidity materials.

Significance: Fracture planes inclined palatal-buccally in apical-coronal direction (+30°) reduce the interfacial stress intensity and natural tissues stress intensity with respect to the other tested configurations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.016DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stress intensity
20
interfacial stress
20
fracture plane
16
maxillary incisors
12
apical-coronal direction
12
0° models
12
stress
9
fractured central
8
central maxillary
8
vivo strain
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!