Patients' satisfaction with facial prostheses.

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg

The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address:

Published: May 2016

We assessed the "impact on wellbeing" and "satisfaction" of patients who had a facial prosthesis (of the ear, nose, or orbit) fitted in The Netherlands Cancer Institute. Patients had either an adhesive-retained or an implant-retained facial prosthesis between 1951 and 2011. We did a cross-sectional survey of 104 patients, then gave a questionnaire to the final study group of 71 (68%), a year or more later. All were satisfied with their prostheses (visual analogue scale (VAS): mean (SD) 8.1(1.5). The implant-retained group were the most satisfied (p=0.022), and the adhesive-retained group felt more self-conscious (p=0.013). Three-quarters of all patients said that the prosthesis was not painful and there were no problems with the way it functioned. A well-designed facial prosthesis has obvious benefits, but there were no appreciable differences between the two groups. Each patient must make a careful decision about which type of prosthesis to choose, taking into account the quality of their remaining tissue, the site of the defect, and their general health.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.09.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

facial prosthesis
12
prosthesis
5
patients' satisfaction
4
facial
4
satisfaction facial
4
facial prostheses
4
prostheses assessed
4
assessed "impact
4
"impact wellbeing"
4
wellbeing" "satisfaction"
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!