Total Body Water, Electrolyte, and Thermoregulatory Responses to Ad Libitum Water Replacement Using Two Different Water Delivery Systems During a 19-km Route March.

J Strength Cond Res

1ERGOnomics TECHnologies, Research and Development, Armscor, Pretoria, South Africa; and 2Division of Biokinetics and Sport Science, Department of Physiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

Published: November 2015

Hands-free hydration systems are often advocated for improved hydration and performance in military populations. The aim was to assess whether such systems indeed result in improved hydration in exercising soldiers. Subjects were required to complete a route march while consuming water ad libitum from either a hydration bladder (BG) or traditional canteen (CG). Water intakes of 538 ml·h⁻¹ (BG) and 533 ml·h⁻¹ (CG) resulted in no differences for changes in body mass, serum [Na], plasma osmolality, total body water, or time required to complete the march. There were no differences between peak exercise core temperature of the BG (38.9° C) and CG (38.7° C) groups. There were no differences between the groups for fluid balance, thermoregulation, or performance. This is a not a surprising finding because the amount of fluid consumed ad libitum is determined by changes in serum osmolality and not the fluid delivery system as often proposed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001028DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

total body
8
body water
8
route march
8
improved hydration
8
required complete
8
water
6
water electrolyte
4
electrolyte thermoregulatory
4
thermoregulatory responses
4
responses libitum
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!