Introduction: The aim of this review was to identify and evaluate existing research to determine the clinical effectiveness and safety of prolotherapy injections for treatment of lower limb tendinopathy and fasciopathy.
Review: Nine databases were searched (Medline, Science Direct, AMED, Australian Medical Index, APAIS-Health, ATSIhealth, EMBASE, Web of Science, OneSearch) without language, publication or data restrictions for all relevant articles between January 1960 and September 2014. All prospective randomised and non-randomised trials, cohort studies, case-series, cross-sectional studies and controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of one or more prolotherapy injections for tendinopathy or fasciopathy at or below the superior aspect of the tibia/fibula were included. Methodological quality of studies was determined using a modified evaluation tool developed by the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group. Data analysis was carried out to determine the mean change of outcome measure scores from baseline to final follow-up for trials with no comparative group, and for randomised controlled trials, standardised mean differences between intervention groups were calculated. Pooled SMD data were calculated where possible to determine the statistical heterogeneity and overall effect for short-, intermediate- and long-term data. Adverse events were also reported. Two hundred and three studies were identified, eight of which met the inclusion criteria. These were then grouped according to tendinopathy or fasciopathy being treated with prolotherapy injections: Achilles tendinopathy, plantar fasciopathy and Osgood-Schlatter disease. The methodological quality of the eight included studies was generally poor, particularly in regards to allocation concealment, intention to treat analysis and blinding procedures. Results of the analysis provide limited support for the hypothesis that prolotherapy is effective in both reducing pain and improving function for lower limb tendinopathy and fasciopathy, with no study reporting a mean negative or non-significant outcome following prolotherapy injection. The analysis also suggests prolotherapy injections provide equal or superior short-, intermediate- and long-term results to alternative treatment modalities, including eccentric loading exercises forAchilles tendinopathy, platelet-rich plasma for plantar fasciopathy and usual care or lignocaine injections for Osgood-Schlatter disease. No adverse events following prolotherapy injections were reported in any study in this review.
Conclusions: The conclusions of this review were derived from the best available scientific evidence. It is intended that the results of this study will assist clinical decision-making by practitioners. The results of this review found limited evidence that prolotherapy injections are a safe and effective treatment for Achilles tendinopathy, plantar fasciopathy and Osgood-Schlatter disease, however more robust research using large, methodologically-sound randomised controlled trials is required to substantiate these findings.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4617485 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0114-5 | DOI Listing |
Pain Manag
December 2024
Sports Medicine, Anahuac Mayab University, Mérida, Yucatan, Mexico.
Background: The aims of this review were to identify and to analyze the clinical studies that used subcutaneous injections of dextrose for treating musculoskeletal pain, in order to establish an overview.
Methods: A systematic search was carried out in scientific databases including Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PUBMED and other sources, up until March 2024. We included clinical studies that used subcutaneous injections of dextrose in the treatment of individuals with musculoskeletal pain associated with tendinopathies, enthesopathy, osteoarthritis, ligament sprains, muscle strains or bursitis of various locations.
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil
September 2024
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Objectives: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of intra-articular and peri-articular dextrose prolotherapy (DPT) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) without effusion.
Patients And Methods: Between August 2018 and November 2018, a total of 51 participants including 27 cases (12 males, 15 females; mean age: 55.7±5.
Cureus
October 2024
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Amrita School of Medicine, Kochi, IND.
Objective: The objective was to analyze the difference between prolotherapy and wet needling (WN) for myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) for the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Clinical Global Impression (CGI), and MTrP count.
Methods: Patients with myofascial pain for 1.5 years were included based on convenience sampling after a pilot study for sample size calculation.
Cureus
October 2024
Orthopaedic Surgery, Unit-II, Sheikh Zayed Medical College Rahim Yar Khan, Rahim Yar Khan, PAK.
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med
December 2024
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!