Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evan.21461 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Contextualizing the Upper Paleolithic of the Armenian Highlands: New data from Solak-1, central Armenia.
J Hum Evol
January 2025
Department of Anthropology, University of Connecticut, 354 Mansfield Road, Unit 2176, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA.
As a potential corridor connecting Southwest Asia with western and northern Europe, the Armenian Highlands and southern Caucasus hold great potential for increasing our understanding of Upper Paleolithic behavioral and cultural variability. However, given the dearth of Upper Paleolithic sites, we lack the data necessary to answer basic questions regarding the timing and nature of the Upper Paleolithic in this region. Solak-1 is an open-air site located along the upper Hrazdan Valley (1635 m above sea level) in central Armenia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFExamining Gravettian and Magdalenian mobility and technological organization with IR spectroscopy.
Sci Rep
January 2025
Department of Early Prehistory and Quaternary Ecology, Institute of Prehistory, Early History and Medieval Archeology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Archaeologists can use the provenance of lithic raw materials to examine the movements, territories, and settlement dynamics of hunter-gatherers. Several studies have used macroscopic analyses to propose the long-distance transport of raw material during the Gravettian and the Magdalenian of the Swabian Jura in Central Europe. Until now hypotheses about raw material transport in this region were not based on reproducible analyses.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFExploring early Acheulian technological decision-making: A controlled experimental approach to raw material selection for percussive artifacts in Melka Wakena, Ethiopia.
PLoS One
January 2025
Department of Prehistory, Institute of Archaeology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
The evolution of human behaviour is marked by key decision-making processes reflected in technological variability in the early archaeological record. As part of the technological system, differences in raw material quality directly affect the way that humans produce, design and use stone tools. The selection, procurement and use of various raw materials requires decision-making to evaluate multiple factors such as suitability to produce and design tools, but also the materials' efficiency and durability in performing a given task.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe Uluzzian and Châtelperronian: No Technological Affinity in a Shared Chronological Framework.
J Paleolit Archaeol
January 2025
Human Origins Research Unit, Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 2, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Unlabelled: The Châtelperronian and Uluzzian techno-complexes are identified in western Europe in the same stratigraphic position, between the late Middle Palaeolithic and other Upper Palaeolithic assemblages. Both industries include retouched artefacts with abrupt retouch and arched backs, and radiometric dating indicates that these two technocomplexes belong to the same window of time. Here, we provide a detailed, qualitative technological comparison of two Châtelperronian and two Uluzzian lithic assemblages based on a collaborative, first-hand examination of these collections.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTechno-structural and 3-D geometric morphometric analysis applied for investigating the variability of Holocene unifacial tools in tropical Central Brazil.
PLoS One
January 2025
Département Homme & Environnement, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, UMR 7194 HNHP, Équipe PRÉTROP, Musée de l'Homme, Paris, France.
During the transition from the Pleistocene to the Holocene and in the early Holocene period, hunter-gatherer communities across tropical South America deployed a range of technological strategies to adapt to diverse environmental conditions. This period witnessed a rich tapestry of technological practices, from enduring, widely disseminated tools to local and sporadically utilized technologies, shaping a multifaceted landscape of technological traditions. Lithic technology during this period was mainly marked by localized sourcing of raw materials, the use of multifunctional tools, a variety of projectile point designs, and the frequently utilization of unifacial shaping technology.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!