Currently, two separate Cochrane reviews, ‘’ and ‘’ describe the effect of antibiotics for acute rhinosinusitis. Although both Cochrane reviews study the same condition, they look at different populations (patients in which the diagnosis was based on clinical signs and symptoms and patients in which the diagnosis was confirmed by imaging). Because of this, the conclusions are different in these Cochrane reviews. This was confusing for clinicians who needed to read both Cochrane reviews to know which conclusions are most applicable to their patients. This review is being withdrawn and will be incorporated into the updated publication of ‘’. This ‘merged’ review will still maintain the relevant distinction between the two populations. However, information on the effectiveness of antibiotics for rhinosinusitis will be published in the ‘merged’ Cochrane review. We will omit the comparison between antibiotics (as published in this Cochrane review) because the choice for certain antibiotics and/or doses differs according to the local antibiotic resistance patterns and therefore this comparison is less relevant. The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10775754 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000243.pub4 | DOI Listing |
J Med Internet Res
January 2025
Cancer Screening, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Background: The online nature of decision aids (DAs) and related e-tools supporting women's decision-making regarding breast cancer screening (BCS) through mammography may facilitate broader access, making them a valuable addition to BCS programs.
Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the scientific evidence on the impacts of these e-tools and to provide a comprehensive assessment of the factors associated with their increased utility and efficacy.
Methods: We followed the 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and conducted a search of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases from August 2010 to April 2023.
J Med Internet Res
January 2025
School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Background: Lifestyle interventions have been acknowledged as effective strategies for preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, the accessibility of conventional face-to-face interventions is often limited. Digital health intervention has been suggested as a potential solution to overcome the limitation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSao Paulo Med J
January 2025
Professor, Master's Program in Innovation in Higher Education in Health, Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul (USCS), São Caetano do Sul (SP), Brazil.
Background: Although multiple strategies have been suggested for evidence-based practice educational interventions, few studies have focused on the development of abilities for evidence-based practice implementation.
Objective: To explore the effectiveness of evidence-based practice in higher education and understand its teaching methods.
Design And Setting: Narrative review was conducted at the Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul, Brazil.
Cien Saude Colet
January 2025
Departamento de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Sergipe. Aracaju SE Brasil.
This review aimed to identify the impact of the ECHO® model on monitoring people diagnosed with diabetes mellitus. It followed the Joanna Briggs Institute and the PRISMA-ScR Checklist. The search was conducted in the Cochrane Library, Embase, Virtual Health Library, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Trauma Nurs
January 2025
Author Affiliations: NOVA Southeastern University, Kiran Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, Florida (Nunes Espat, Breeding, Nasef, and Amin); University of Hawaii, John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii (Chin); Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, Florida (Dr Elkbuli); and Department of Surgical Education, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, Florida (Dr Elkbuli).
Background: Tennis is a globally popular sport offering physical benefits but poses a high risk of injury due to its demands and prolonged gameplay. While injuries are common among professional players, detailed injury data for this group is limited.
Objective: This review aims to analyze trends in the incidence, type, region, and onset of injuries in professional tennis players, with particular attention to gender distribution, to improve guidelines and reduce injury impacts on performance and career longevity.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!