No evidence for higher risk of cancer in patients with multiple sclerosis taking cladribine.

Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm

Blizard Institute (Neuroscience) (J.P., G.D., M.M., D.B., K.S.), Queen Mary University of London, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK; Oxford University Medical School (J.P.), John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (D.R.A.), London, UK; Centre for Health Services Research (S.P.), Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Barts Health NHS Trust (B.P.T., M.M., K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, London, UK; Stem Cell Centre (G.J.), Lund University, Lund, Sweden; and Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre (J.C.), Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London UK.

Published: December 2015

Objective: To compare the cancer risk of cladribine and other disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) in trials of people with relapsing multiple sclerosis (pwRMS).

Methods: Meta-analysis of phase III trials of licensed DMDs for pwRMS and a phase III trial of cladribine (CLARITY). Cancer rates were compared using Fisher exact test.

Results: Eleven trials were included. Investigated treatments included cladribine, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, teriflunomide, natalizumab, alemtuzumab, and glatiramer acetate. The cancer rate in the CLARITY treatment group (0.34%) was not increased compared to all other treatment groups, whether including placebo-controlled trials only (0.6%, p = 0.4631) or all trials, i.e., including those with an active comparator arm (0.67%, p = 0.3669). No cancer was reported in the CLARITY placebo group, whereas the combined cancer rate of all other placebo groups was 1.19% (p = 0.0159). The cancer rate of zero in the CLARITY placebo group was also lower than that in the phase III trial of cladribine in people with clinically isolated syndrome (ORACLE MS, 2.91%, p = 0.0012). In fact, no difference was detected between cancer rates in the treatment groups of CLARITY (0.34%) and ORACLE MS (0.49%) (p = 0.6546).

Conclusions: Our study does not support an increased cancer risk from cladribine in the doses used in CLARITY and ORACLE MS, which previously contributed to refusal of market authorization of cladribine in Europe. Longer-term follow-up is required to assess the safety profile of cladribine, as well as currently licensed DMDs, to definitively assess cancer risk.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4592538PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000158DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cancer risk
12
phase iii
12
cancer rate
12
cancer
10
multiple sclerosis
8
cladribine
8
risk cladribine
8
licensed dmds
8
iii trial
8
trial cladribine
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!