In Vitro and In Vivo Assessment of Nonionic Iodinated Radiographic Molecules as Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Magnetic Resonance Imaging Tumor Perfusion Agents.

Invest Radiol

From the *Istituto di Biostrutture e Bioimmagini - CNR, Molecular Biotechnology Center, and †Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Imaging Center, University of Turin, Turin; ‡Department of Science and Technological Innovation, Università del Piemonte Orientale A. Avogadro, Alessandria, Italy; §Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Hanshan Normal University, Guangdong, China; ∥Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Published: March 2016

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate 4 nonionic x-ray iodinated contrast agents (CAs), commonly used in radiographic procedures, as novel chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) agents by assessing their in vitro exchange properties and preliminary in vivo use as tumor enhancing agents.

Materials And Methods: The CEST properties, as function of pH (range, 5.5-7.9) and of radio frequency conditions (irradiation field strength range of 1-9 μT and time of 1-9 seconds), have been determined at 7 T and 310 K for 4 x-ray CAs commonly used in clinical settings, namely, iomeprol, iohexol, ioversol, and iodixanol. Their in vivo properties have been investigated upon intravenous injection in a murine HER2+ breast tumor model (n = 4 mice for each CA) using both computed tomography (CT) and MRI modalities.

Results: The prototropic exchange rates measured for the 4 investigated iodinated molecules showed strong pH dependence with base catalyzed exchange rate that was faster for monomeric compounds (20-4000 Hz in the pH range of 5.5-7.9). Computed tomography quantification showed marked (up to 2 mg I/mL concentration) and prolonged accumulation (up to 30 minutes postinjection) inside tumor regions. Among the 4 agents we tested, iohexol and ioversol display good CEST contrast properties at 7 T, and in vivo results confirmed strong and prolonged contrast enhancement of the tumors, with elevated extravasation fractions (74%-91%). A strong and significant correlation was found between CT and CEST-MRI tumor-enhanced images (R = 0.70, P < 0.01).

Conclusions: The obtained results demonstrate that iohexol and ioversol, 2 commonly used radiographic compounds, can be used as MRI perfusion agents, particularly useful when serial images acquisitions are needed to complement CT information.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000217DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

iohexol ioversol
12
chemical exchange
8
exchange saturation
8
saturation transfer
8
magnetic resonance
8
resonance imaging
8
perfusion agents
8
cas commonly
8
commonly radiographic
8
range 55-79
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • This study analyzed the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to investigate negative reactions associated with iodinated contrast media (ICM) over nearly two decades (2004-2023).
  • It focused on five types of ICMs, assessing 11 million reports to identify the nature and strength of adverse events linked to these drugs using various statistical methods.
  • Findings indicated significant adverse drug reactions primarily related to respiratory and immune disorders, with specific concerns for throat irritation among females linked to ioversol and iopromide.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparative Safety Profiles and Usage Patterns of Iodinated Contrast Media in Medical Imaging.

Diagnostics (Basel)

November 2024

Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 07345, Republic of Korea.

Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the usage patterns and hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) profiles of six nonionic iodinated contrast media (ICMs) used in computed tomography (CT) to enhance patient safety and inform evidence-based contrast agent selection.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 248,209 CT scans obtained between January 2020 and December 2022. Six ICMs (iomeprol, iohexol, ioversol, iopromide, iodixanol, and iobitridol) were compared on the basis of their usage rates, HSR incidence, and severity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Skin Test Reactivity Patterns in Patients Allergic to Iodinated Contrast Media: A Refined View.

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract

March 2024

Institut Desbrest d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique, UMR UA11, University of Montpellier-INSERM, Montpellier, France; Department of Pulmonology, Division of Allergy, Arnaud de Villeneuve, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Background: Two-dimensional (2D) classifications of iodinated contrast media (ICM) are insufficient to explain the observed skin test (ST) reactivity patterns in patients with drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) to ICM.

Objective: To refine the current view on allergic DHRs to ICM by analyzing ST reactivity patterns in patients with previous reactions to ICM.

Methods: Patients with a history of DHR to ICM and positive STs, who presented at the University Hospital of Montpellier between 2004 and 2022, were included in the study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the Pharmacovigilance (PV) and severity of hypersensitivity reactions induced by non-ionic Iodinated Contrast Media (ICM) in the radiology diagnosis reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the reports of ICM-induced hypersensitivity reactions submitted to the FAERS database between January 2015 and January 2023 and conducted a disproportionality analysis. The seven most common non-ionic ICM, including iohexol, iopamidol, ioversol, iopromide, iomeprol, iobitridol, and iodixanol, were chiefly analyzed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Iodinated X-ray contrast media (ICM) was frequently detected in the aqueous environment. In this work, the applicability of three graphene-based nanomaterials (graphene nanosheets (GNS), graphene oxide (GO), and reduced graphene oxide (rGO)) for the adsorptive removal of the six ICMs including iohexol, iopamidol, iomeprol, iopromide, iodixanol and ioversol from aqueous solution was firstly evaluated by batch adsorption method. Among the three graphene-based nanomaterials, the GNS displayed the best adsorption performances for the adsorption of the six ICMs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!