Background. The Arclight ophthalmoscope is a low-cost alternative to standard direct ophthalmoscopes. This study compared the Arclight ophthalmoscope with the Heine K180 direct ophthalmoscope to evaluate its reliability in assessing the vertical cup disc ratio (VCDR) and its ease of use (EOU). Methods. Eight medical students used both the Arclight and the Heine ophthalmoscopes to examine the optic disc in 9 subjects. An EOU score was provided after every examination (a higher score indicating that the ophthalmoscope is easier to use). A consultant ophthalmologist provided the reference standard VCDR. Results. 288 examinations were performed. The number of examinations that yielded an estimation of the VCDR was significantly higher for the Arclight ophthalmoscope (125/144, 85%) compared to the Heine ophthalmoscope (88/144, 61%) (p < 0.001). The mean difference from the reference standard VCDR was similar for both instruments, with a mean of -0.078 (95% CI: -0.10 to -0.056) for the Arclight and -0.072 (95% CI: -0.097 to -0.046) for Heine (p = 0.69). The overall EOU score was significantly higher for the Arclight ophthalmoscope (p < 0.001). Conclusion. The Arclight ophthalmoscope performs as well as, and is easier to use than, a standard direct ophthalmoscope, suggesting it is a reliable, low-cost alternative.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4589625 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/743263 | DOI Listing |
Indian J Ophthalmol
January 2025
Department of Ophthalmology, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, US.
Eye (Lond)
August 2024
Global Health Team, School of Medicine, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, UK.
J Interprof Care
September 2023
School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, Fife, Scotland.
Visual impairment and blindness affect an estimated 2.2 billion people worldwide. Accessible low-cost diagnostic tools and interprofessional education and collaborative practice are part of ongoing strategies to improve eye care services.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEye (Lond)
January 2023
Infection & Global Health Division, School of Medicine, Medical and Biological Sciences Building, North Haugh, St Andrews, KY16 9TF, UK.
Objectives: We compare the optical quality and design characteristic a new low cost solar powered binocular indirect ophthalmoscope (BIO), Holo, to Keeler BIO.
Methods: Twenty-four participants each examined 10 simulation eyes using both the Holo and the Keeler BIO with a 30-diopter condensing lens. Number of Lea symbols printed on the retina of simulation eyes seen and time taken to identify them was recorded.
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc
November 2021
The diagnosis and treatment of eye diseases is heavily reliant on the availability of retinal imagining equipment. To increase accessibility, lower-cost ophthalmoscopes, such as the Arclight, have been developed. However, a common drawback of these devices is a limited field of view.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!