A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Double-blind evaluation of analgesic efficacy of orally administered diclofenac, nefopam, and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) plus codeine in chronic cancer pain. | LitMetric

Double-blind evaluation of analgesic efficacy of orally administered diclofenac, nefopam, and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) plus codeine in chronic cancer pain.

Pain

Division of Medical Oncology, Policlinico, 06100 PerugiaItaly Institute of Internal Medicine I, University of Perugia, 06100 PerugiaItaly Institute of Anesthesiology, University of Perugia, 06100 PerugiaItaly Medical Department Ciba-Geigy, Origgio, 21040 VareseItaly.

Published: February 1989

The analgesic efficacy and toxicity of oral diclofenac sodium 50 mg (q.i.d.) vs. nefopam 60 mg (q.i.d.) and a combination of 640 mg ASA and 40 mg codeine (q.i.d.) in cancer patients with moderate to severe chronic pain has been evaluated in a randomized double-blind study. Planned duration of treatment was 10 days. Pain intensity was evaluated by a visual analog scale. The length of patient participation in the trial, the patient's final global evaluation and the incidence of side effects were also evaluated. Ninety-nine patients were enrolled in the study. All treatments produced a statistically significant pain relief (P less than 0.01) without differences among groups but only 26 of 99 patients (26.3%) completed the planned treatment period. Mean time in the study was 4.65 days. Inefficacy and side effects were the main reasons for premature treatment interruption. Patients treated with nefopam had a significantly shorter period in the study than patients treated with the other 2 treatments. Adverse effects were slightly more frequent with the nefopam and ASA + codeine regimens. The 3 therapeutic regimens appear to be similar as to analgesic efficacy, but diclofenac presents the advantage of a slightly better safety profile than nefopam and the ASA + codeine combination.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(89)90021-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

asa codeine
16
analgesic efficacy
12
side effects
8
patients treated
8
nefopam asa
8
nefopam
5
patients
5
double-blind evaluation
4
evaluation analgesic
4
efficacy orally
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!