Genetic Counselors' Experiences Regarding Communication of Reproductive Risks with Autosomal Recessive Conditions found on Cancer Panels.

J Genet Couns

Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, & Development, University of Minnesota, 321 Church Street, 6-160 Jackson Hall, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.

Published: April 2016

AI Article Synopsis

  • The rise of hereditary cancer genetic testing panels has changed how genetic counseling is conducted, as certain gene mutations present both cancer and reproductive risks for autosomal recessive conditions.
  • A survey of 189 cancer genetic counselors revealed that over half discussed these reproductive risks with patients, particularly when they had positive test results and were of childbearing age.
  • Responses indicated inconsistencies in when and how reproductive risks are addressed, highlighting the need for established professional guidelines to streamline these discussions.

Article Abstract

The development of hereditary cancer genetic testing panels has altered genetic counseling practice. Mutations within certain genes on cancer panels pose not only a cancer risk, but also a reproductive risk for autosomal recessive conditions such as Fanconi anemia, constitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome, and ataxia telangiectasia. This study aimed to determine if genetic counselors discuss reproductive risks for autosomal recessive conditions associated with genes included on cancer panels, and if so, under what circumstances these risks are discussed. An on-line survey was emailed through the NSGC list-serv. The survey assessed 189 cancer genetic counselors' experiences discussing reproductive risks with patients at risk to carry a mutation or variant of uncertain significance (VUS) in a gene associated with both an autosomal dominant cancer risk and an autosomal recessive syndrome. Over half (n = 82, 55 %) reported having discussed reproductive risks; the remainder (n = 66, 45 %) had not. Genetic counselors who reported discussing reproductive risks primarily did so when patients had a positive result and were of reproductive age. Reasons for not discussing these risks included when a patient had completed childbearing or when a VUS was identified. Most counselors discussed reproductive risk after obtaining results and not during the informed consent process. There is inconsistency as to if and when the discussion of reproductive risks is taking place. The wide variation in responses suggests a need to develop professional guidelines for when and how discussions of reproductive risk for autosomal recessive conditions identified through cancer panels should occur with patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9892-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reproductive risks
24
autosomal recessive
20
recessive conditions
16
cancer panels
16
reproductive risk
12
risk autosomal
12
reproductive
10
genetic counselors'
8
counselors' experiences
8
risks
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!