Study Objective: Epinephrine autoinjector use for anaphylaxis is increasing. There are reports of digit injections because of incorrect autoinjector use, but no previous reports of lacerations, to our knowledge. We report complications of epinephrine autoinjector use in children and discuss features of these devices, and their instructions for use, and how these may contribute to injuries.

Methods: We queried emergency medicine e-mail discussion lists and social media allergy groups to identify epinephrine autoinjector injuries involving children.

Results: Twenty-two cases of epinephrine autoinjector-related injuries are described. Twenty-one occurred during intentional use for the child's allergic reaction. Seventeen children experienced lacerations. In 4 cases, the needle stuck in the child's limb. In 1 case, the device lacerated a nurse's finger. The device associated with the injury was operated by health care providers (6 cases), the patient's parent (12 cases, including 2 nurses), educators (3 cases), and the patient (1 case). Of the 3 epinephrine autoinjectors currently available in North America, none include instructions to immobilize the child's leg. Only 1 has a needle that self-retracts; the others have needles that remain in the thigh during the 10 seconds that the user is instructed to hold the device against the leg. Instructions do not caution against reinjection if the needle is dislodged during these 10 seconds.

Conclusion: Epinephrine autoinjectors are lifesaving devices in the management of anaphylaxis. However, some have caused lacerations and other injuries in children. Minimizing needle injection time, improving device design, and providing instructions to immobilize the leg before use may decrease the risk of these injuries.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.07.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

epinephrine autoinjector
16
autoinjector children
8
epinephrine autoinjectors
8
instructions immobilize
8
epinephrine
7
autoinjector
5
cases
5
lacerations
4
lacerations embedded
4
embedded needles
4

Similar Publications

Background: Anaphylaxis is a systemic allergic reaction that is potentially life-threatening. Occupational anaphylaxis is an anaphylaxis that occurs in an occupational context. In this position paper, we propose diagnostic criteria for occupational anaphylaxis and provide an overview of the current state of knowledge in terms of prevalence, triggers, prevention, and management.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Anaphylaxis.

Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol

December 2024

Division of Allergy & Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Anaphylaxis is an acute, potentially fatal systemic hypersensitivity reaction with varied mechanisms and clinical presentations. Although prompt recognition and treatment of anaphylaxis are imperative, both patients and healthcare professionals often fail to recognize and diagnose its early signs. Clinical manifestations vary widely, however, the most common signs are cutaneous symptoms, including urticaria and angioedema.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Food Allergy in Children in China.

Clin Exp Allergy

December 2024

Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

The prevalence of food allergies in China seems to be increasing, but there are limited studies describing the pattern of food allergies across the country. This review highlights regional variations observed across China, with data indicating a higher prevalence in the more economically developed eastern and southern coastal regions compared to inland areas. Egg and milk are the most common allergies among children under 3 years old; for children above 3 years old, specific food allergens also show regional differences, with shellfish allergies being more common in southern and eastern coastal areas, while wheat and fruit allergies are more prevalent in northern regions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A health economic analysis of noninjectable epinephrine compared with intramuscular epinephrine.

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol

December 2024

Section of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.

Background: Noninjectable epinephrine to treat allergic reactions addresses an unmet need. Intranasal epinephrine is approved and a sublingual form is under development. Inhaled epinephrine is poorly studied for anaphylaxis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * The study involved 81 children aged 0 to 12, and results showed the FAQLQ-PF had excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.94) and was effective in assessing HRQOL.
  • * Key findings indicated that HRQOL was affected by the number of food allergies, symptoms experienced, and parental concerns, but not by sex or general health status, providing valuable insights for managing food allergies among Greek children.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!