Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the same femoral component after cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty. The results were compared in terms of hip scores, subsidence, and survivorship.
Methods: Between 1986 and 1996, 1017 primary THAs were implanted in 882 patients using the same porous-coated, titanium-alloy, femoral component. 507 cemented stems (441 patients) and 510 uncemented stems (441 patients) were compared. The primary diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 866 hips (85%). 541 patients were female (61%). The clinical results were evaluated based on the Harris hip score. Radiographs were evaluated at each follow-up for stem subsidence and loosening. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to determine stem survivorship. The average follow-up of the entire cohort was 13.2 years (range, 2-26 y).
Results: The average Harris Hip Scores at 20 years follow-up was 87 points in the cemented group and 85 points in the uncemented group. Pain scores averaged 42 and 38 in the cemented and uncemented group, respectively, at 20 years. There were 6 loose stems identified in the cemented group (1.2%) and 2 loose stems in the uncemented group (0.4%). Cemented and uncemented stem survivorship at 20 years was 98.1% and 99.6%, respectively. There was no difference in cemented or uncemented stem survivorship at any time period.
Conclusions: Although there were more cases of aseptic cemented femoral component loosening, there was no significant difference in stem survivorship out to 20 years whether this stem was implanted with or without cement.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000296 | DOI Listing |
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
December 2024
Faculty of Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenberger Strasse 69, 4040, Linz, Austria.
Introduction: Cementless fixation plays an increasing role in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The objective of this review article is to analyze functional outcomes and survivorship of cementless TKA.
Materials And Methods: A comprehensive literature search for studies reviewing the outcome and survivorship of cementless TKA was conducted.
Orthop Surg
December 2024
Medical School Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, University Hospital Brandenburg, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
Objective: Femoral neck fractures in the elderly are a global health issue, with the choice between cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty remaining a topic of debate. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the effects of the two surgical options on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), mortality, and functional outcomes.
Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing cemented with uncemented hemiarthroplasty in patients aged 50 years and older with femoral neck fractures.
Orthop Surg
December 2024
Department of Orthopedics, The 960th Hospital of the People's Liberation Army, Jinan, China.
Objective: Aseptic loosening (AL) is a common mechanical complication following reconstruction of the distal femoral cemented prosthesis (DFCP), often resulting in severe bone loss, which complicates prosthesis revision. 3D-printed personalized implants represent an emerging solution for the reconstruction of complex bone defects. This study aimed to investigate the early therapeutic effects of using a 3D-printed, customized, uncemented stem prosthesis for revising aseptic AL in DFCP.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: Hip deformity is frequent after childhood osteonecrosis in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). When they are adults, they present a challenge as candidates for total hip arthroplasty (THA) because of abnormal bone development, their relative youth, and also because of their disease. Performing subtrochanteric osteotomy associated with THA is technically challenging, and healing of osteotomies has never been reported in this population with frequent osteonecrotic bone, whether using cemented or uncemented arthroplasties.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJBJS Rev
December 2024
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is increasingly used in the treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) with reliable clinical improvement. However, the preferred techniques for humeral stem fixation are varied and may be influenced by patient and injury characteristics, including bone quality and fracture pattern. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to determine the effect of humeral component cementing and bone grafting on tuberosity healing rates and functional outcomes after RSA for PHFs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!