Comparison of the EUCAST and CLSI Broth Microdilution Methods for Testing Isavuconazole, Posaconazole, and Amphotericin B against Molecularly Identified Mucorales Species.

Antimicrob Agents Chemother

Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Published: December 2015

We compared EUCAST and CLSI antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) methods for triazoles and amphotericin B against 124 clinical Mucorales isolates. The EUCAST method yielded MIC values 1- to 3-fold dilutions higher than those of the CLSI method for amphotericin B. The essential agreements between the two methods for triazoles were high, i.e., 99.1% (voriconazole), 98.3% (isavuconazole), and 87% (posaconazole), whereas it was significantly lower for amphotericin B (66.1%). Strategies for harmonization of the two methods for Mucorales AFST are warranted.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4649204PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02107-15DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

eucast clsi
8
methods triazoles
8
comparison eucast
4
clsi broth
4
broth microdilution
4
methods
4
microdilution methods
4
methods testing
4
testing isavuconazole
4
isavuconazole posaconazole
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!