Background: Adequate antiplatelet therapy in patients with myocardial infarction with ST-elevation (STEMI) is vital in order to avoid ischemic complications. However, especially with the novel potent oral drugs, bleeding is a major concern. We aimed to investigate whether STEMI patients switched to novel ADP receptor inhibitors due to high platelet reactivity (HPR) on clopidogrel have similar outcomes compared to patients with adequate response to clopidogrel.

Methods: A prospective cohort of 175 STEMI patients (mean age 62.3 years) undergoing primary PCI were included in the PASTOR study. Patients were loaded with 600 mg clopidogrel before the index PCI procedure. Bedside VerifyNow P2Y12 platelet function testing was performed the following morning.

Results: 46 patients (26.3%) were found to have HPR on clopidogrel (PRU>235) and were switched to novel ADP receptor antagonists. The remaining 129 patients were treated with clopidogrel. The mean duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was 6.7 months. Duration of entire follow-up of patients was approximately 2 years. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) while patients were on DAPT occurred in 7.0% in the clopidogrel group compared to 8.7% in the novel ADP receptor antagonist group (p=0.70). No differences were observed between groups off-DAPT either.

Conclusions: Following primary PCI for STEMI, patients with adequate response to clopidogrel show similar outcomes compared to patients switched to novel ADP receptor antagonists due to HPR on clopidogrel. Platelet reactivity testing can be used to guide the choice of antiplatelet therapy in patients with STEMI treated by primary PCI.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.09.074DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

primary pci
16
novel adp
16
adp receptor
16
antiplatelet therapy
12
patients
12
stemi patients
12
switched novel
12
hpr clopidogrel
12
pci stemi
8
pastor study
8

Similar Publications

Management of acute myocardial infarction in chronic kidney disease in Germany: an observational study.

BMC Nephrol

January 2025

Department of Internal Medicine II, Universitätsmedizin (Halle), Medical Faculty of the Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.

Background: Managing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or end-stage renal disease on dialysis (renal replacement therapy, RRT) presents challenges due to elevated complication risks. Concerns about contrast-related kidney damage may lead to the omission of guideline-directed therapies like percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in this population.

Methods: We analysed German-DRG data of 2016 provided by the German Federal Bureau of Statistics (DESTATIS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the distribution of coronary collaterals (CC) as per the Rentrop Collateral Score (RCS) among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and its impact on in-hospital and 30-day mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods: In this study, a selected sample of consecutive STEMI patients was assessed for the development of CC as per the RCS classification. An RCS grade of 2 or 3 was taken as the presence of CC with either partial or complete filling of the infarct-related artery (IRA).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: There is an ongoing debate whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the better choice for treatment of left main (LM) stenosis. We aimed to provide external validation for the recently reviewed guideline recommendations for invasive LM therapy by evaluating the impact of CABG or PCI on long-term survival from local reports of different regions in the world. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to address contemporary registry studies comparing PCI and CABG for patients with LM stenosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease, most but not all randomized trials have reported that complete revascularization (CR) offers advantages over culprit vessel-only revascularization. In addition, the optimal timing and assessment methods for CR remain undetermined.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify the optimal revascularization strategy in patients with STEMI and multivessel disease, using a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!