Introduction: Knowledge of whether final infarct volume (FIV) predicts disability after mild stroke is limited. We sought to determine if FIV could differentiate good versus poor outcome after mild stroke.
Methods: We retrospectively identified 65 patients with mild stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale≤5) in a multicenter registry of 2453 patients. We evaluated associations between FIV and clinical outcome and evaluated the optimal FIV threshold that discriminated favorable (modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0-1) versus poor (mRS 2-6) outcome.
Results: The FIV cut-point of 20 mL differentiated favorable and poor outcomes (area under curve (AUC) 0.73, 95% confidence interval: 0.58-0.88). Favorable outcome was observed in 37/45 (82%) with FIV<20 mL, compared to 5/14 (36%) with FIV≥20 mL (p<0.01). FIV≥20 mL remained strongly associated with poor outcome independent of age, gender, stroke severity, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), and proximal arterial occlusion.
Conclusion: In our small sample size, an FIV of 20 mL best differentiated between the likelihood of good versus poor outcome in patients with mild stroke. Further validation of infarct volume as a surrogate marker in mild stroke is warranted.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4757309 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1971400915609347 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!