A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Approach to intraoperative electromagnetic navigation in orthognathic surgery: A phantom skull based trial. | LitMetric

Introduction: Intraoperative guidance using electromagnetic navigation is an upcoming method in maxillofacial surgery. However, due to their unwieldy structures, especially the line-of-sight problem, optical navigation devices are not used for daily orthognathic surgery. Therefore, orthognathic surgery was simulated on study phantom skulls, evaluating the accuracy and handling of a new electromagnetic tracking system.

Material And Methods: Le-Fort I osteotomies were performed on 10 plastic skulls. Orthognathic surgical planning was done in the conventional way using plaster models. Accuracy of the gold standard, splint-based model surgery versus an electromagnetic tracking system was evaluated by measuring the actual maxillary deviation using bimaxillary splints and preoperative and postoperative cone beam computer tomography imaging. The distance of five anatomical marker points were compared pre- and postoperatively.

Results: The electromagnetic tracking system was significantly more accurate in all measured parameters compared with the gold standard using bimaxillary splints (p < 0.01). The data shows a discrepancy between the model surgical plans and the actual correction of the upper jaw of 0.8 mm. Using the electromagnetic tracking, we could reduce the discrepancy of the maxillary transposition between the planned and actual orthognathic surgery to 0.3 mm on average.

Discussion: The data of this preliminary study shows a high level of accuracy in surgical orthognathic performance using electromagnetic navigation, and may offer greater precision than the conventional plaster model surgery with bimaxillary splints.

Conclusion: This preliminary work shows great potential for the establishment of an intraoperative electromagnetic navigation system for maxillofacial surgery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.08.022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

electromagnetic navigation
16
orthognathic surgery
16
electromagnetic tracking
16
electromagnetic
8
intraoperative electromagnetic
8
surgery
8
maxillofacial surgery
8
conventional plaster
8
gold standard
8
model surgery
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!