Purpose: To identify areas of consensus and disagreement in the management of paediatric cataract using a modified Delphi approach among individuals recognised for publishing in this field.
Design: A modified Delphi method.
Participants: International paediatric cataract experts with a publishing record in paediatric cataract management.
Methods: The process consisted of three rounds of anonymous electronic questionnaires followed by a face-to-face meeting, followed by a fourth anonymous electronic questionnaire. The executive committee created questions to be used for the electronic questionnaires. Questions were designed to have unit-based, multiple choice or true-false answers. The questionnaire included issues related to the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative management of paediatric cataract.
Main Outcome Measure: Consensus based on 85% of panellists being in agreement for electronic questionnaires or 80% for the face-to-face meeting, and near consensus based on 70%.
Results: Sixteen of 22 invited paediatric cataract surgeons agreed to participate. We arrived at consensus or near consensus for 85/108 (78.7%) questions and non-consensus for the remaining 23 (21.3%) questions.
Conclusions: Those questions where consensus was not reached highlight areas of either poor evidence or contradicting evidence, and may help investigators identify possible research questions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307287 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!