AI Article Synopsis
- Qualitative research is increasingly prevalent in public health literature, especially when combined with community-based participatory research (CBPR), but there's a lack of guidance on presenting such research for publication.
- The article offers practical guidelines for writing about qualitative research within a CBPR framework to help inexperienced partners and enhance manuscript preparation for peer-reviewed journals.
- It highlights the benefits of qualitative inquiry, provides tips for organizing manuscripts, addresses common pitfalls, and includes examples of successful peer-reviewed publications in this area.
Article Abstract
Background: Qualitative research is appearing with increasing frequency in the public health and medical literature. Qualitative research in combination with a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach can be powerful. However little guidance is available on how to present qualitative research within a CBPR framework for peer-review publications.
Objectives: This article provides a brief overview of how qualitative research can advance CBPR partnerships and outlines practical guidelines for writing for publication about qualitative research within a CBPR framework to (1) guide partners with little experience publishing in peer-reviewed journals and/or (2) facilitate effective preparation of manuscripts grounded in qualitative research for peer-reviewed journals. We provide information regarding the specific benefits of qualitative inquiry in CBPR, tips for organizing the manuscript, questions to consider in preparing the manuscript, common mistakes in the presentation of qualitative research, and examples of peer-reviewed manuscripts presenting qualitative research conducted within a CBPR framework.
Conclusions: Qualitative research approaches have tremendous potential to integrate community and researcher perspectives to inform community health research findings. Effective dissemination of CBPR informed qualitative research findings is crucial to advancing health disparities research.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2015.0041 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
What Can We Learn From Qualitative Impact Evaluations About the Effectiveness of Lobby and Advocacy? A Meta-Evaluation of Dutch aid Programmes and Assessment Tool.
Eval Rev
January 2025
Global Development Network, Lanzhou University and Director of Evaluation, New Delhi, India.
Official development agencies are increasingly supporting civil society lobby and advocacy (L&A) to address poverty and human rights. However, there are challenges in evaluating L&A. As programme objectives are often to change policies or practices in a single institution like a Government Ministry, L&A programmes are often not amenable to large-n impact evaluation methods.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClinical genetic services in the Emilia-Romagna region, Italy: current activity and open issues: a mixed-method study.
J Community Genet
January 2025
Medical Genetics Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
In 2002, in the Emilia-Romagna region of Italy, a comprehensive strategic plan was developed with the aim of improving the integration and efficiency of the genetic services. Two decades later, this report aims to explore the current functioning of the regional network, with special focus on clinical genetics in the evolving scenarios. To this aim, we analyzed the activity data of the medical genetics services in the region, to identify and possibly improve currently open issues.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFExamining Truth Regimes Reveals How Local Communities View Flooding and River Management in the Lower Missouri River Basin, USA.
Environ Manage
January 2025
School of Public Policy and Urban Affairs, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Riverine flooding is increasing in frequency and intensity, requiring river management agencies to consider new approaches to working with communities on flood mitigation planning. Communication and information sharing between agencies and communities is complex, and mistrust and misinformation arise quickly when communities perceive that they are excluded from planning. Subsequently, riverfront community members create narratives that can be examined as truth regimes-truths created and repeated that indicate how flooding and its causes are understood, represented, and discussed within their communities-to explain why flooding occurs in their area.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: Transgender individuals may face familial and social hostility, leading to distress that significantly affects their well-being. This study aims to understand life course challenges experienced by transgender people since childhood.
Method: Cross-sectional study, including 20 transgender people.
Learning From Pregnant Women Eating 5 Servings or More of Vegetables Daily: Strategies, Behaviors, and Motivators.
J Nutr Educ Behav
January 2025
School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Women's and Newborn Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Objective: To explore the context, behaviors, strategies, and motivators of pregnant women who consume 5 servings of vegetables daily.
Methods: Positive deviance study involving Australian pregnant women (9 of 529) identified through a validated food frequency questionnaire. Semistructured interviews explored their strategies, behaviors, and motivators.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!