A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Frequency of Wr(a) antigen and anti-Wr(a) in Brazilian blood donors. | LitMetric

Background: Wr(a) is a low-incidence antigen, which is antithetical to the high prevalence red blood cell antigen, Wr(b). Anti-Wr(a) is a naturally occurring antibody that is found in approximately 1-2% of blood donors. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of Wr(a) and anti-Wr(a) in Brazilian blood donors.

Methods: A total of 1662 Brazilian blood donors were molecularly analyzed using the SNaPshot methodology to determine the WR*A/B alleles and to predict the frequency of the Wr(a) antigen. To detect the anti-Wr(a), samples from 1049 blood donors were analyzed using a gel test with Wr(a+) red blood cells. The serum was treated with dithiothreitol (DTT) to determine the immunoglobulin classes. Immunoglobulin (Ig)-G isotype classification was performed in a gel test using the IgG1/IgG3 card. A monocyte monolayer assay was employed to predict the clinical significance of IgG anti-Wr(a).

Results: Of the 1662 donors, only one sample had the DI*02.03 allele in heterozygous predicting the Wr(a+b+) phenotype. Anti-Wr(a) was detected in 34 (3.24%) samples, 64.7% in females and 35.3% in males. Regarding the immunoglobulin class, eight (23.5%) cases of anti-Wr(a) were classified as IgG and 26 (76.5%) as IgM. Of the eight cases of IgG anti-Wr(a), four were IgG1, two were IgG3 and three anti-Wr(a) were not IgG3 or IgG1, and thus probably IgG2 or IgG4. The results of the monocyte monolayer assay showed that IgG anti-Wr(a) might be of clinical significance.

Conclusion: This study shows a very low frequency (0.06%) of the Wr(a) antigen in Brazilian blood donors. Additionally, it shows that the frequency of anti-Wr(a) in this population is higher than previously reported.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4685090PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjhh.2015.07.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

blood donors
20
brazilian blood
16
frequency wra
12
wra antigen
12
anti-wra
10
anti-wra brazilian
8
blood
8
red blood
8
gel test
8
monocyte monolayer
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!