Background: With the recent advances of surgical adjuncts including presurgical naso-alveolar molding and postoperative nasal stenting, information on the anthropometric evaluation of cleft lip nasal symmetry after primary rhinoplasty is lacking.

Method: Twenty-nine nonsyndromic patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate undergoing modified rotation advancement cheiloplasty with synchronous primary rhinoplasty in our center were prospectively recruited in our study. All of them received our center's peri-operative management protocol, including presurgical naso-alveolar molding and postoperative nasal stenting. Direct anthropometric measurements of their nasal configuration were documented when they were anesthetized for primary lip repair at 3 months of age and for the primary palate repair at 12 months of age. Their nasal configurations were analyzed before primary rhinoplasty and at 9 months after rhinoplasty.

Results: There is a statistically significant change in nasal symmetry at 9 months after the primary rhinoplasty. There is no significant correlation between the nasal configuration before and at 9 months after the primary rhinoplasty.

Conclusions: With significant relapse of nasal deformity at 9 months after the primary rhinoplasty despite the use of presurgical naso-alveolar molding and postoperative nasal stenting, overcorrection of the nasal configuration at primary rhinoplasty should be considered for optimal long-term nasal symmetrical outcome.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1597/15-125DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

primary rhinoplasty
28
nasal configuration
16
cleft lip
12
presurgical naso-alveolar
12
naso-alveolar molding
12
molding postoperative
12
postoperative nasal
12
nasal stenting
12
months primary
12
nasal
11

Similar Publications

Background: Preservation rhinoplasty, particularly dorsal preservation, has gained prominence with the advent of piezoelectric instruments, which minimize trauma and enhance precision in bone reshaping. This approach presents unique challenges, especially in closed techniques, where spatial limitations complicate the use of piezotomes.

Objectives: To evaluate outcomes of piezo-assisted preservation rhinoplasty using specialized instrumentation to enhance visibility, precision, and postoperative recovery in closed rhinoplasty procedures.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The benefits and cost-effectiveness of functional septorhinoplasty have been previously demonstrated. However, reimbursement for functional septorhinoplasty by health insurance companies remains inconsistent. The purpose of this study is to define the current state of insurance coverage for functional septorhinoplasty.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The decision to undertake rhinoplasty maneuvers during cleft lip repair remains controversial. Little data compare long-term outcomes with and without primary rhinoplasty (PR). This study compared nasolabial outcomes in cohorts with unilateral cleft lip (UCL) treated with and without PR at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia using standardized aesthetic and anthropometric assessments.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hyaluronic acid (HA) injection, traditionally used for non-surgical rhinoplasty, is often associated with adverse effects such as increased nasal dorsum width. This study introduces the linear stereoscopic stack volume enhancement (LSSVE) injection technique as a solution for patients with low-profile noses, aiming to improve the nasal dorsum dimension, prevent long-term nasal widening, and address related concerns. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical registry data of patients treated at Shanghai Phiskin Clinic from December 2020 to June 2024, who received HA injections using the LSSVE technique.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Repositioning and fixation of the posterior septal angle (PSA) relative to the anterior nasal spine (ANS) is a well-known maneuver performed during rhinoplasty. Suture techniques through the periosteum along with transosseous drilling through the spine are the two most common fixation methods. We report on how nasal airway patency varies as a function of technique and patient demographic factors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!