Methodological issues relative to the quantification of root surface caries.

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect upon the quantification of root surface caries (RSC) of (1) the separation of the disease into its discrete clinical phases, (2) the confounding caused by the presence of restored abraded surfaces, and (3) the decision rule formulated for dealing with lesions and restorations which involve both crown and root. It was found that the apparent prevalence of RSC varied widely depending upon arbitrary decisions as to what stages of the disease were included in the measurement scheme. The addition of restorations (confined to the root) greatly enlarged the various disease measures, but probably also introduced some degree of error since there are several indications from the data and the clinical patterns of affected surfaces which suggest that some of the restored surfaces were formerly abraded rather than carious. The inclusion of lesions and restorations involving both root and crown produced another conspicuous increment in all disease measures, which is a cause for concern given that these components are included in some studies and ignored in others. These findings serve as the basis for several recommendations for future prevalence and incidence studies of RSC.