AI Article Synopsis

  • A study was conducted on metastatic solid cancer patients using advanced genetic screening techniques to identify potential treatments tailored to their specific tumor profiles.
  • Out of 428 enrolled patients, most underwent molecular profiling, revealing that 84.0% had genetic aberrations, and 103 were successfully matched with targeted therapies.
  • The study found that patients receiving genome-matched treatments had significantly higher response rates, especially in specific cancer types like gastrointestinal and lung cancers, compared to those receiving non-matched treatments.

Article Abstract

We conducted a prospective genomic screening trial with high throughput sequencing and copy number variation (CNV) assay, and immunohistochemistry array in metastatic solid cancer patients. We used Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 and nCounter Copy Number Variation Assay (21 genes) to identify molecular targets for potential matched therapy. Metastatic solid tumor patients were prospectively consented for molecular profiling tests. The primary outcome for this trial was the feasibility of molecular tests and response rate (matched vs non-matched treatment). Between November 2013 and August 2014, a total of 428 metastatic solid tumor patients were enrolled on to this study. The mutational profiles were obtained for 407 (95.1%) patients. CNV 21-gene assays were successfully performed in 281 (65.7%) of 428 patients. Of the 407 patients with molecular profiling results, 342 (84.0%) patients had one or more aberrations detected. Of the 342 patients, 103 patients were matched to molecularly targeted agents in the context of clinical trials or clinical practice. The response rate was significantly higher in the genome-matched treated group for gastrointestinal/hepatobiliary/rare tumors (matched vs non-matched treatment, 42.6% vs 24.3%, P = .009) and lung cancer cohort (matched vs non-matched treatment, 61.2% vs 28.6% < P = .001) when compared with the non-matched group. In this trial, we demonstrate that genome-matched treatment based on molecular profiling result in better treatment outcome in terms of response rate.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4741771PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.5188DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

metastatic solid
16
molecular profiling
12
response rate
12
matched non-matched
12
non-matched treatment
12
patients
10
screening trial
8
solid cancer
8
cancer patients
8
copy number
8

Similar Publications

Background: Selpercatinib is approved for the treatment of -fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Objective: We present a final update on LIBRETTO-321 to enhance the understanding of long-term efficacy and safety in Chinese patients.

Design: This open-label, multicenter, phase II study included patients with advanced -altered solid tumors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Potential Antioxidant Effects of Common Omani Ethnobotanical Plants.

Prev Nutr Food Sci

December 2024

Department of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat 123, Oman.

Phytonutrients (e.g., phenolic compounds and flavonoids) are secondary plant metabolites that play an important role in the defense against pathogens and protection from oxidative injury because of their potential ability to neutralize reactive oxygen species.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The primary treatment of metastatic spine disease is radiation therapy (RT), traditionally conventional external beam RT (EBRT) or stereotactic body RT (SBRT). Until recently, there had been no Level 1 evidence supporting SBRT over EBRT, which has led to difficulties obtaining insurance approval. Publication of the first randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing SBRT to EBRT for spine metastases [Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG)] helped change this.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Although CAR-T cell therapy has limited efficacy against solid tumors, it has been hypothesized that prior treatment with Image-Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) would increase CAR-T cell tumor infiltration, leading to improved antigen specific expansion of CAR-T cells.

Methods: To test this hypothesis in a metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) model, we engineered two anti-CEA single-chain Fab (scFab) CAR-T cells with signaling domains from CD28zeta and 4-1BBzeta, and tested them and .

Results: The anti-CEA scFab CAR-T cells generated from three different human donors demonstrated robust expression, expansion, and lysis of only CEA-positive TNBC cells, with the CD28z-CAR-T cells showing the highest cytotoxicity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!