AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study focused on a school-based health intervention aimed at reducing screen-time behaviors among adolescents aged 12 to 15 in Cuenca, Ecuador, to help combat non-communicable diseases.
  • - The intervention included two stages, first addressing diet, physical activity, and screen-time, followed by a focus on diet and physical activity alone, with outcomes assessed after each stage.
  • - Results showed a decrease in screen-time behaviors after the first stage, but a slight increase in TV and total screen-time during weekdays after the second stage, with no adverse effects reported.

Article Abstract

Background: Effective interventions on screen-time behaviours (television, video games and computer time) are needed to prevent non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries. The present manuscript investigates the effect of a school-based health promotion intervention on screen-time behaviour among 12- to 15-year-old adolescents. We report the effect of the trial on screen-time after two stages of implementation.

Methods: We performed a cluster-randomised pair matched trial in urban schools in Cuenca-Ecuador. Participants were adolescents of grade eight and nine (mean age 12.8 ± 0.8 years, n = 1370, control group n = 684) from 20 schools (control group n = 10). The intervention included an individual and environmental component tailored to the local context and resources. The first intervention stage focused on diet, physical activity and screen-time behaviour, while the second stage focused only on diet and physical activity. Screen-time behaviours, primary outcome, were assessed at baseline, after the first (18 months) and second stage (28 months). Mixed linear models were used to analyse the data.

Results: After the first stage (data from n = 1224 adolescents; control group n = 608), the intervention group had a lower increase in TV-time on a week day (β = -15.7 min; P = 0.003) and weekend day (β = -18.9 min; P = 0.005), in total screen-time on a weekday (β = -25.9 min; P = 0.03) and in the proportion of adolescents that did not meet the screen-time recommendation (β = -4 percentage point; P = 0.01), compared to the control group. After the second stage (data from n = 1078 adolescents; control group n = 531), the TV-time on a weekday (β = 13.1 min; P = 0.02), and total screen-time on a weekday (β = 21.4 min; P = 0.03) increased more in adolescents from the intervention group. No adverse effects were reported.

Discussion And Conclusion: A multicomponent school-based intervention was only able to mitigate the increase in adolescents' television time and total screen-time after the first stage of the intervention or in other words, when the intervention included specific components or activities that focused on reducing screen-time. After the second stage of the intervention, which only included components and activities related to improve healthy diet and physical activity and not to decrease the screen-time, the adolescents increased their screen-time again. Our findings might imply that reducing screen-time is only possible when the intervention focuses specifically on reducing screen-time.

Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01004367.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4580309PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2274-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

control group
20
second stage
16
screen-time
14
intervention included
12
diet physical
12
physical activity
12
total screen-time
12
intervention
10
school-based intervention
8
adolescents
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!