International Atomic Energy Agency Randomized Phase III Study of Radiation Therapy in Elderly and/or Frail Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme.

J Clin Oncol

Wilson Roa, Suzanne Drodge, and Sunita Ghosh, University of Alberta, Alberta Health Services-Cancer Control, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Lucyna Kepka, Warmia and Mazury Oncology Center, Olsztyn; Katarzyna Dyttus-Cebulok, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland; Narendra Kumar, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India; Valery Sinaika, N.N. Alexandrov National Cancer Centre of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus; Juliana Matiello, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre; Douglas Guedes de Castro, Castro DG, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil; Darejan Lomidze, High Technology Medical Center, University Clinic, Tbilisi, Georgia; Dalenda Hentati, Institut National de Cancer Salah Azaiz, Ministère de la Santé Publique, Bab Saadoum, Tunisia; Branislav Jeremić, Institute of Lung Diseases, Institutski put 4, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; and Eduardo Rosenblatt and Elena Fidarova, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.

Published: December 2015

Purpose: The optimal radiotherapy regimen for elderly and/or frail patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma remains to be established. This study compared two radiotherapy regimens on the outcome of these patients.

Patients And Methods: Between 2010 and 2013, 98 patients (frail = age ≥ 50 years and Karnofsky performance status [KPS] of 50% to 70%; elderly and frail = age ≥ 65 years and KPS of 50% to 70%; elderly = age ≥ 65 years and KPS of 80% to 100%) were prospectively randomly assigned to two arms in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by age (< and ≥ 65 years old), KPS, and extent of surgical resection. Arm 1 received short-course radiotherapy (25 Gy in five daily fractions over 1 week), and arm 2 received commonly used radiotherapy (40 Gy in 15 daily fractions over 3 weeks).

Results: The short-course radiotherapy was noninferior to commonly used radiotherapy. The median overall survival time was 7.9 months (95% CI, 6.3 to 9.6 months) in arm 1 and 6.4 months (95% CI, 5.1 to 7.6 months) in arm 2 (P = .988). Median progression-free survival time was 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.5 to 5.9) in arm 1 and 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 5.7) in arm B (P = .716). With a median follow-up time of 6.3 months, the quality of life between both arms at 4 weeks after treatment and 8 weeks after treatment was not different.

Conclusion: There were no differences in overall survival time, progression-free survival time, and quality of life between patients receiving the two radiotherapy regimens. In view of the reduced treatment time, the short 1-week radiotherapy regimen may be recommended as a treatment option for elderly and/or frail patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.62.6606DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

age ≥
16
≥ years
16
survival time
16
months 95%
16
elderly and/or
12
and/or frail
12
frail patients
12
patients newly
12
newly diagnosed
12
diagnosed glioblastoma
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!