A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Residue evaluation of imidacloprid, spirotetramat, and spirotetramat-enol in/on grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) and soil. | LitMetric

A combination of imidacloprid and spirotetramat effectively controls sucking pests on grapevines. Residues of these insecticides on grapes were evaluated after treatment with spirotetramat 12% + imidacloprid 12% (240 SC) three times at 90 and 180 g a.i. ha(-1). The samples were extracted and purified by QuEChERS method and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography with a photodiode array detector (imidacloprid) and gas chromatography mass spectrometry (spirotetramat and its metabolite spirotetramat-enol). Satisfactory results were obtained with ranges of 80.6-98.6% for the recovery, 3.1-10% for the relative standard deviation range, and 9.8-15.6% for the uncertainty. The limits of detection and quantification were 0.015 μg mL(-1) and 0.05 mg kg(-1), respectively. Initial residue concentrations of imidacloprid after the 90 and 180 g a.i. ha(-1) treatments were 0.912 (half-life 11 days) and 1.681 mg kg(-1) (half-life 12.4 days), respectively. For spirotetramat + spirotetramat-enol, the residue concentrations were 1.337 (half-life 5.6 days) and 2.0 mg kg(-1) (half-life 7.6 days) for the 90 and 180 g a.i. ha(-1) treatments, respectively. Spirotetramat degraded faster than spirotetramat-enol. After treatment at 90 g a.i. ha(-1), the initial residues of both insecticides were within European Union maximum residue limits and a 1-day pre-harvest interval (PHI) was adequate for safe consumption of grapes. After treatment at 180 g a.i. ha(-1), the required PHI was 7 day. Therefore, a PHI of 7 day should be used after treatment with imidacloprid and spirotetramat.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4859-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

180 ai ha-1
16
imidacloprid spirotetramat
12
half-life days
12
residues insecticides
8
residue concentrations
8
ai ha-1 treatments
8
kg-1 half-life
8
phi day
8
spirotetramat
6
imidacloprid
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!