Objective: To evaluate the distance between the cementoenamel junction and the alveolar bone crest before and after orthodontic treatment using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Materials And Methods: The sample comprised 30 patients with Angle Class I malocclusion and mild to moderate crowding. The study database comprised dental CBCT scans obtained before and after orthodontic treatment. The distance between the cementoenamel junction to the bone crest of the buccal (n = 720) and lingual (n = 720) surfaces was measured in 24 teeth for each patient using a specific software tool (Xoran version 3.1.62). The Wilcoxon test was used for statistical analysis, and the level of significance was set at P < .05.
Results: The distance between the cementoenamel junction and the bone crest increased in 822 (57%) of the 1440 surfaces after orthodontic treatment. The buccal surface of the lower central incisors had the greatest frequency of increased distance (75%), and the lingual surface of lateral incisors had the lowest (40%). The distance between the cementoenamel junction and the alveolar bone crest was greater than 2 mm (alveolar bone dehiscence) in 162 (11%) of the 1440 surfaces before orthodontic treatment and in 279 (19%) after treatment.
Conclusions: The distance from the cementoenamel junction to the bone crest changed after orthodontic treatment; the distance was greater than 2 mm in 11% of the surfaces before treatment and in 19% after treatment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601496 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/040815-235.1 | DOI Listing |
Clin Adv Periodontics
December 2024
Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University of Isfahan (Khorasgan), Isfahan, Iran.
Background: This study aimed to assess the relationship of maxillary alveolar bone thickness (BT) and height (BH) with gingival phenotype (GP) in smokers and nonsmokers using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 60 participants. The participants underwent periodontal examination, and their GP was determined by placing a periodontal probe in the gingival sulcus at the midline and observing the transparency.
Biomol Ther (Seoul)
January 2025
Laboratory of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea.
The active component in cannabis, cannabidiol (CBD), was first isolated from the hemp plant in 1940. Chronic pain, inflammation, migraines, depression, and anxiety have long been treated with CBD. The fundamental mechanisms of CBD's effects on periodontal inflammation have yet to be fully understood.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Dent Res
December 2024
Department of Periodontology & Tissue Engineering and Regeneration, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
HS, as a typical metabolite of periodontal pathogens, exhibits a clear positive correlation with the occurrence and development of periodontitis. HS at physiological concentrations can regulate many biological processes. However, excess HS in the periodontal pocket can trigger secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, cause oxidative stress, and result in mitochondrial damage and cell death in human gingival fibroblasts, exacerbating periodontitis development and periodontal tissue destruction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
October 2024
Periodontology and Dental Implantology, Medical University of Varna, Varna, BGR.
Context and objective The main goal of periodontal therapy is to remove periodontopathogenic microorganisms and regenerate destructured periodontal tissues. Advances in biomaterials have improved the results of regenerative procedures. However, there is limited data available to determine the best material for vertical bone deformities treated with regenerative treatment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Pers Med
October 2024
Department of Orthodontics, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung, University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833253, Taiwan.
Objective: Mandibular full-arch distalization (MFD) is a popular approach, particularly in non-extraction cases. However, we still cannot confirm whether facial patterns affect the amount of limits. This study aimed to determine the anatomical MFD limits in patients with different facial patterns.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!