Objective: To assess differences in pitch-ranking ability across a range of speech understanding performance levels and as a function of electrode position.
Study Design: An observational study of a cross-section of cochlear implantees.
Setting: Tertiary referral center for cochlear implantation.
Patients: A total of 22 patients were recruited. All three manufacturers' devices were included (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria, n = 10; Advanced Bionics, California, USA, n = 8; and Cochlear, Sydney, Australia, n = 4) and all patients were long-term users (more than 18 months). Twelve of these were poor performers (scores on BKB sentence lists <60%) and 10 were excellent performers (BKB >90%).
Intervention: After measurement of threshold and comfort levels, and loudness balancing across the array, all patients underwent thorough pitch-ranking assessments at 80% of comfort levels.
Main Outcome Measure: Ability to discriminate pitch across the electrode array, measured by consistency in discrimination of adjacent pairs of electrodes, as well as an assessment of the pitch order across the array using the midpoint comparison task.
Results: Within the poor performing group there was wide variability in ability to pitch rank, from no errors, to a complete inability to reliably and consistently differentiate pitch change across the electrode array. Good performers were overall significantly more accurate at pitch ranking (p = 0.026). Consistent pitch ranking was found to be a significant independent predictor of BKB score, even after adjusting for age. Users of the MED-EL implant experienced significantly more pitch confusions at the apex than at more basal parts of the electrode array.
Conclusions: Many cochlear implant users struggle to discriminate pitch effectively. Accurate pitch ranking appears to be an independent predictor of overall outcome. Future work will concentrate on manipulating maps based upon pitch discrimination findings in an attempt to improve speech understanding.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4588601 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000845 | DOI Listing |
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
December 2024
Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Background: There is a dearth of information on the effects of bone conductive devices on temporal processing in individuals with single-sided deafness (SSD). This study investigates the effect of an adhesive bone conductive device on temporal processing in adults with SSD.
Methods: A prospective cohort study of temporal processing in adults with SSD was undertaken.
J Voice
December 2024
Delsys, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts 01760; Altec, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts 01760; Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215. Electronic address:
Introduction: People who undergo a total laryngectomy lose their natural voice and depend on alaryngeal technologies for communication. However, these technologies are often difficult to use and lack prosody. Surface electromyographic-based silent speech interfaces are novel communication systems that overcome many of the shortcomings of traditional alaryngeal speech and have the potential to seamlessly incorporate individualized prosody.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Acoust Soc Am
September 2024
Aix Marseille Université, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Centrale Méditerranée, Laboratoire de Mécanique et d'Acoustique, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, 13453 Cedex 13, France.
Hear Res
September 2024
Program of Speech and Hearing Science, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, 975 S. Myrtle Av., Tempe, AZ 85287, USA. Electronic address:
Contemporary cochlear implants (CIs) use cathodic-leading symmetric biphasic (C-BP) pulses for electrical stimulation. It remains unclear whether asymmetric pulses emphasizing the anodic or cathodic phase may improve spectral and temporal coding with CIs. This study tested place- and temporal-pitch sensitivity with C-BP, anodic-centered triphasic (A-TP), and cathodic-centered triphasic (C-TP) pulse trains on apical, middle, and basal electrodes in 10 implanted ears.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Voice
July 2024
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.
Background: The term vocal demand response refers to how speakers meet vocal demands. Vocal loading tasks with predetermined demand parameters (duration, pitch, loudness, etc) have been used in research to study the vocal demand response; these have historically consisted of loud sustained vowel and loud speech tasks. Tasks founded on laryngeal diadochokinesis (LDDK) may be viable alternatives, especially if demand parameters such as exercise-rest ratio and fluid back pressure are concurrently modulated.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!