Regulatory Monitoring of Fortified Foods: Identifying Barriers and Good Practices.

Glob Health Sci Pract

Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition, Large Scale Food Fortification, Geneva, Switzerland.

Published: September 2015

AI Article Synopsis

  • Despite the global push for food fortification, many programs struggle due to weak regulatory monitoring that fails to ensure compliance with national standards.
  • Less than 50% of food samples in a study from various countries meet the required fortification levels, highlighting significant deficiencies.
  • Recommendations for improvement include enhancing technical skills, ensuring reliable funding and leadership, and addressing political obstacles to better oversee food fortification initiatives.

Article Abstract

While fortification of staple foods and condiments has gained enormous global traction, poor performance persists throughout many aspects of implementation, most notably around the critical element of regulatory monitoring, which is essential for ensuring foods meet national fortification standards. Where coverage of fortified foods is high, limited nutritional impact of fortification programs largely exists due to regulatory monitoring that insufficiently identifies and holds producers accountable for underfortified products. Based on quality assurance data from 20 national fortification programs in 12 countries, we estimate that less than half of the samples are adequately fortified against relevant national standards. In this paper, we outline key findings from a literature review, key informant interviews with 11 fortification experts, and semi-quantitative surveys with 39 individuals from regulatory agencies and the food fortification industry in 17 countries on the perceived effectiveness of regulatory monitoring systems and barriers to compliance against national fortification standards. Findings highlight that regulatory agencies and industry disagree on the value that enforcement mechanisms have in ensuring compliance against standards. Perceived political risk of enforcement and poorly resourced inspectorate capacity appear to adversely reinforce each other within an environment of unclear legislation to create a major hurdle for improving overall compliance of fortification programs against national standards. Budget constraints affect the ability of regulatory agencies to create a well-trained inspector cadre and improve the detection and enforcement of non-compliant and underfortified products. Recommendations to improve fortification compliance include improving technical capacity; ensuring sustained leadership, accountability, and funding in both the private and the public sectors; and removing political barriers to ensure consistent detection of underfortified products and enforcement of applicable fortification standards. Only by taking concrete steps to improve the entire regulatory system that is built on a cooperative working relationship between regulatory agencies and food producers will a nutrition strategy that uses fortification see its intended health effects.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4570017PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00171DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

regulatory monitoring
16
regulatory agencies
16
national fortification
12
fortification standards
12
fortification programs
12
underfortified products
12
fortification
11
regulatory
9
fortified foods
8
national standards
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!