Development of a simulation-based assessment to evaluate the clinical competencies of Korean nursing students.

Objectives: To describe a simulation-based assessment (SBA) to evaluate the clinical competencies of nursing students in children's health and to compare its results with grade point average (GPA), self-efficacy, topic-specific knowledge, and self-reported clinical competency using the Six-D Scale.

Methods: This cross-sectional, descriptive study recruited nursing students from a children's health clinical practicum. Students were assigned to either an asthma (n=55) or a type 1 diabetes (n=48) care scenario conducted on a high-fidelity simulator. Clinical competencies were assessed using the global rating scale (GRS) and a checklist.

Results: Data on 103 students were analyzed. The SBA-GRS indicated that 64.6%-87.3% of students passed. The SBA-GRS showed a statistically significant positive association with the SBA checklist in both the asthma (rho=.763, p<.001) and the type 1 diabetes (rho=.475, p=.001) group. In the asthma group, the SBA-GRS and checklist showed statistically significant associations with GPA (rho=.413, p=.002 vs. r=.508, p<.001) and the Six-D Scale (rho=.266, p=.049 vs. r=.352, p=.008); in the diabetes group, only the SBA checklist showed a statistically significant association with self-efficacy (r=.339, p=.018) and the Six-D Scale (r=.373, p=.009). Four groups by SBA-GRS had statistically significant differences in scores on the SBA checklist in both groups (F=25.757, p<.001 in the asthma group; F=4.790, p=.006 in the diabetes group) and GPA only in the asthma groups (F=6.095, p<.001).

Conclusion: SBA was found to be feasible for nursing students. The GRS and checklist were reasonably correlated with other evaluation methods of student competency, but correlations were better with easier scenarios.